ArticleThe Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD2005
A novel method for creating artificial mutant samples for performance evaluation and quality control in clinical molecular genetics.
Article in The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Overcoming polyploidy pitfalls: a user guide for effective SNP conversion into KASP markers in wheat.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2020Article
- Reference standards for next-generation sequencing.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2017Review
- Article
- Current landscape and new paradigms of proficiency testing and external quality assessment for molecular genetics.Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The lack of readily available, patient-derived materials for molecular genetic testing of many heterozygous or rare disorders creates a major impediment for laboratory proficiency and quality control procedures. The paucity of clinically derived mutation-positive samples could be surmounted if it were possible to construct artificial samples containing mutations of interest that would sufficiently resemble natural human samples. Such samples could then function as acceptable and realistic performance evaluation challenges and quality control reagents for recipient laboratories. Using the cystic fibrosis gene (CFTR) as a prototype, we have devised and executed experiments designed to generate unique DNA samples that could be used for these purposes. We used site-directed mutagenesis to generate mutations of interest in plasmid DNA derived from common bacterial artificial chromosome sources containing the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance receptor gene. CFTR mutations G85E and 1078delT were chosen to represent mutations in the original American College of Medical Genetics-recommended population-screening panel of 25 mutations. DNA samples containing predetermined concentrations and ratios of wild-type and mutated plasmids, bacterial artificial chromosomes of interest, and nonhuman genomic carrier DNA were characterized and tested in-house and in a group of nine pilot testing laboratories using a variety of technical platforms. The results indicate that these constructs, containing CFTR mutations in heterozygous and homozygous states, can serve as valid and accessible materials for quality assurance, including performance evaluation, proficiency testing, and assay quality control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.