Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15858140›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD2005

Amplification of whole tumor genomes and gene-by-gene mapping of genomic aberrations from limited sources of fresh-frozen and paraffin-embedded DNA.

Markus Bredel, Claudia Bredel, Dejan Juric, Young Kim, Hannes Vogel, Griffith R Harsh, Lawrence D Recht, Jonathan R Pollack, Branimir I Sikic

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A procedure for highly specific, sensitive, and unbiased whole-genome amplification.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2008
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Markus BredelDivision of Oncology, Clinical Sciences Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, 269 Campus Dr., CCSR-1105, Stanford, CA 94305-5151, USA.
Claudia Bredel
Dejan Juric
Young Kim
Hannes Vogel
Griffith R Harsh
Lawrence D Recht
Jonathan R Pollack
Branimir I Sikic

Funding

Role of Gene Amplification in Breast CancerR01CA097139 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI POLLACK, JONATHAN R · 2003 to 2007
$1.6M
Regulation of the Human MDR1 GeneR01CA092474 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SIKIC, BRANIMIR I · 2002 to 2005
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS CA 92474NCI NIH HHS CA 97139NCI NIH HHS R01 CA092474NCI NIH HHS R01 CA097139
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sufficient quantity of genomic DNA can be a bottleneck in genome-wide analysis of clinical tissue samples. DNA polymerase Phi29 can be used for the random-primed amplification of whole genomes, although the amplification may introduce bias in gene dosage. We have performed a detailed investigation of this technique in archival fresh-frozen and formalin-fixed/paraffin-embedded tumor DNA by using cDNA microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization. Phi29 amplified DNA from matched pairs of fresh-frozen and formalin-fixed/paraffin-embedded tumor samples with similar efficiency. The distortion in gene dosage representation in the amplified DNA was nonrandom and reproducibly involved distinct genomic loci. Regional amplification efficiency was significantly linked to regional GC content of the template genome. The biased gene representation in amplified tumor DNA could be effectively normalized by using amplified reference DNA. Our data suggest that genome-wide gene dosage alterations in clinical tumor samples can be reliably assessed from a few hundred tumor cells. Therefore, this amplification method should lend itself to high-throughput genetic analyses of limited sources of tumor, such as fine-needle biopsies, laser-microdissected tissue, and small paraffin-embedded specimens.

Indexed as

Chromosome AberrationsChromosome MappingNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesDNA, NeoplasmFrozen SectionsGenome, HumanHumansNeoplasmsParaffin EmbeddingViral ProteinsDNA, Neoplasmterminal protein, Bacillus phage phi29Viral Proteins

Identifiers

PMID15858140
PMCPMC1867518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.