Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15858060›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2005

Function and coding in the blowfly H1 neuron during naturalistic optic flow.

J H van Hateren, R Kern, G Schwerdtfeger, M Egelhaaf

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Quantitative Characterization of Output from the Directionally Selective Visual Interneuron H1 in the Grey Flesh FlyJournal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  2. Encoding of yaw in the presence of distractor motion: studies in a fly motion sensitive neuron.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The many facets of adaptation in fly visual motion processing.Communicative & integrative biology · 2009
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Dynamic properties of large-field and small-field optomotor flight responses in Drosophila.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2007
    Article
  19. Characterisation of a blowfly male-specific neuron using behaviourally generated visual stimuli.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2007
    Article
  20. Correlation versus gradient type motion detectors: the pros and cons.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2007
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

J H van HaterenDepartment of Neurobiophysics, University of Groningen, NL-9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands. j.h.van.hateren@rug.nl
R Kern
G Schwerdtfeger
M Egelhaaf

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Naturalistic stimuli, reconstructed from measured eye movements of flying blowflies, were replayed on a panoramic stimulus device. The directional movement-sensitive H1 neuron was recorded from blowflies watching these stimuli. The response of the H1 neuron is dominated by the response to fast saccadic turns into one direction. The response between saccades is mostly inhibited by the front-to-back optic flow caused by the forward translation during flight. To unravel the functional significance of the H1 neuron, we replayed, in addition to the original behaviorally generated stimulus, two targeted stimulus modifications: (1) a stimulus in which flow resulting from translation was removed (this stimulus produced strong intersaccadic responses); and (2) a stimulus in which the saccades were removed by assuming that the head follows the smooth flight trajectory (this stimulus produced alternating zero or nearly saturating spike rates). The responses to the two modified stimuli are strongly different from the response to the original stimulus, showing the importance of translation and saccades for the H1 response to natural optic flow. The response to the original stimulus thus suggests a double function for the H1 neuron, assisting two major classes of movement-sensitive output neurons targeted by H1. First, its strong response to saccades may function as a saccadic suppressor (via one of its target neurons) for cells involved in figure-ground discrimination. Second, its intersaccadic response may increase the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of wide-field neurons involved in detecting translational optic flow between saccades, in particular when flying speeds are low or when object distances are large.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsEye MovementsFemaleFunctional LateralityHeadInsectaMotion PerceptionNeuronsPhotic StimulationSaccadesVisual Pathways

Identifiers

PMID15858060
PMCPMC6725116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.