Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15857935›Full record

ArticleGut2005

Increasing incidence of Barrett's oesophagus in the general population.

E M van Soest, J P Dieleman, P D Siersema, M C J M Sturkenboom, E J Kuipers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gut, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 108 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
108citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

108 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Approach to gastroenterological diseases in primary care.Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis · 2018
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Prevalence of Barrett's Esophagus in Asian Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2015
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

48 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

E M van SoestDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Postbus 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands. e.vansoest@erasmusmc.nl
J P Dieleman
P D Siersema
M C J M Sturkenboom
E J Kuipers

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBarrett's oesophagus (BO) predisposes to oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Epidemiological data suggest that the incidence of BO is rising but it is unclear whether this reflects a true rise in incidence of BO or an increase in detection secondary to more upper gastrointestinal endoscopies performed. This study aimed to examine the changes in BO incidence relative to the number of upper gastrointestinal endoscopies performed in the general population.

methodsWe conducted a cohort study using the Integrated Primary Care Information database. This general practice research database contains the complete and longitudinal electronic medical records of more than 500,000 persons.

resultsIn total, 260 incident cases of BO were identified during the study period. The incidence of BO increased from 14.3/100,000 person years in 1997 (95% confidence interval (CI) 8.6-22.4) to 23.1/100,000 person years (95% CI 17.2-30.6) in 2002 (r2 = 0.87). The number of upper gastrointestinal endoscopies decreased from 7.2/1000 person years (95% CI 6.7-7.7) to 5.7/1000 person years (95% CI 5.4-6.1) over the same time period. This resulted in an overall increase in detected BO per 1000 endoscopies from 19.8 (95% CI 12.0-31.0) in 1997 to 40.5 (95% CI 30.0-53.5) in 2002 (r2 = 0.93). The incidence of adenocarcinoma increased from 1.7/100,000 person years (95% CI 0.3-5.4) in 1997 to 6.0/100,000 person years (95% CI 3.3-10.2) in 2002 (r2 = 0.87).

conclusionThe incidence of diagnosed BO is increasing, independent of the number of upper gastrointestinal endoscopies that are being performed. This increase in BO incidence will likely result in a further increase in the incidence of oesophageal adenocarcinomas in the near future.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAge DistributionBarrett EsophagusEndoscopy, GastrointestinalEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsPopulation SurveillanceSex Distribution

Identifiers

PMID15857935
PMCPMC1774890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.