Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15857514›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2005

Strain-specific differences in Neisseria gonorrhoeae associated with the phase variable gene repertoire.

Philip W Jordan, Lori A S Snyder, Nigel J Saunders

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. CRISPRi-mediated repression of threeJournal of bacteriology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Atypical, Yet Not Infrequent, Infections withPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Genus-Wide Comparative Genomics Analysis ofInternational journal of genomics · 2019
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Phase variable DNA repeats inMicrobial genomics · 2016
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Philip W JordanBacterial Pathogenesis and Functional Genomics Group, The Sir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3RE, UK. Philip.Jordan@path.ox.ac.uk
Lori A S Snyder
Nigel J Saunders
University of Oxford · GBGenomics (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are several differences associated with the behaviour of the four main experimental Neisseria gonorrhoeae strains, FA1090, FA19, MS11, and F62. Although there is data concerning the gene complements of these strains, the reasons for the behavioural differences are currently unknown. Phase variation is a mechanism that occurs commonly within the Neisseria spp. and leads to switching of genes ON and OFF. This mechanism may provide a means for strains to express different combinations of genes, and differences in the strain-specific repertoire of phase variable genes may underlie the strain differences.

resultsBy genome comparison of the four publicly available neisserial genomes a revised list of 64 genes was created that have the potential to be phase variable in N. gonorrhoeae, excluding the opa and pilC genes. Amplification and sequencing of the repeat-containing regions of these genes allowed determination of the presence of the potentially unstable repeats and the ON/OFF expression state of these genes. 35 of the 64 genes show differences in the composition or length of the repeats, of which 28 are likely to be associated with phase variation. Two genes were expressed differentially between strains causing disseminated infection and uncomplicated gonorrhoea. Further study of one of these in a range of clinical isolates showed this association to be due to sample size and is not maintained in a larger sample.

conclusionThe results provide us with more evidence as to which genes identified through comparative genomics are indeed phase variable. The study indicates that there are large differences between these four N. gonorrhoeae strains in terms of gene expression during in vitro growth. It does not, however, identify any clear patterns by which previously reported behavioural differences can be correlated with the phase variable gene repertoire.

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsDNA, BacterialGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, BacterialGenes, BacterialGenetic VariationNeisseria gonorrhoeaeRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidSpecies SpecificityBacterial ProteinsDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID15857514
PMCPMC1097732
OpenAlexW2161085554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.