Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15855487›Full record

Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2005

Virological and pharmacological parameters predicting the response to lopinavir-ritonavir in heavily protease inhibitor-experienced patients.

Anne-Geneviève Marcelin, Isabelle Cohen-Codar, Martin S King, Philippe Colson, Emmanuel Guillevic, Diane Descamps, Claire Lamotte, Véronique Schneider, Jacques Ritter, Michel Segondy and 15 more

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Lopinavir exposure with an increased dose during pregnancy.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2008
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Lopinavir tablet pharmacokinetics with an increased dose during pregnancy.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2010
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Anne-Geneviève MarcelinDepartment of Virology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, 83 Boulevard de l'hôpital, 75013 Paris, France. anne-genevieve.marcelin@psl.ap-hop-paris.fr
Isabelle Cohen-Codar
Martin S King
Philippe Colson
Emmanuel Guillevic
Diane Descamps
Claire Lamotte
Véronique Schneider
Jacques Ritter
Michel Segondy
Hélène Peigue-Lafeuille
Laurence Morand-Joubert
Anne Schmuck
Annick Ruffault
Pierre Palmer
Marie-Laure Chaix
Vincent Mackiewicz
Véronique Brodard
Jacques Izopet
Jacqueline Cottalorda
Evelyne Kohli
Jean-Pierre Chauvin
Dale J Kempf
Gilles Peytavin
Vincent Calvez

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genotypic inhibitory quotient (GIQ) has been proposed as a way to integrate drug exposure and genotypic resistance to protease inhibitors and can be useful to enhance the predictivity of virologic response for boosted protease inhibitors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictivity of the GIQ in 116 protease inhibitor-experienced patients treated with lopinavir-ritonavir. The overall decrease in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) RNA from baseline to month 6 was a median of -1.50 log(10) copies/ml and 40% of patients had plasma HIV-1 RNA below 400 copies/ml at month 6. The overall median lopinavir study-state C(min) concentration was 5,856 ng/ml. Using univariate linear regression analyses, both lopinavir GIQ and the number of baseline lopinavir mutations were highly associated with virologic response through 6 months. In the multivariate analysis, only lopinavir GIQ, baseline HIV RNA, and the number of prior protease inhibitors were significantly associated with response. When the analysis was limited to patients with more highly mutant viruses (three or more lopinavir mutations), only lopinavir GIQ remained significantly associated with virologic response. This study suggests that GIQ could be a better predictor of the virologic response than virological (genotype) or pharmacological (minimal plasma concentration) approaches used separately, especially among patients with at least three protease inhibitor resistance mutations. Therapeutic drug monitoring for patients treated by lopinavir-ritonavir would likely be most useful in patients with substantially resistant viruses.

Indexed as

AdultAgedDrug CombinationsDrug MonitoringFemaleGenotypeHIV-1HIV InfectionsHIV Protease InhibitorsHumansLinear ModelsLopinavirMaleMiddle AgedMutationPredictive Value of TestsDrug CombinationsHIV Protease InhibitorsLopinavirPyrimidinonesRitonavirRNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID15855487
PMCPMC1087618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.