Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15855269›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2005

A transcriptional response to singlet oxygen, a toxic byproduct of photosynthesis.

Jennifer R Anthony, Kristin L Warczak, Timothy J Donohue

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 154 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Do carotenoids protect phytodetritus-associated bacteria from oxidative stress?Environmental science and pollution research international · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Photodynamic treatment ofRSC medicinal chemistry · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Implication of the σMicrobiology spectrum · 2023
    Article
  9. Expanding the genetic toolkit helps dissect a global stress response in the early-branching speciesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer R AnthonyDepartment of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin, 420 Henry Mall, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
Kristin L Warczak
Timothy J Donohue
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

PROCESS AND REGULATION OF CYTOCHROME C SYNTHESISR01GM037509 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON · PI DONOHUE, TIMOTHY J · 1988 to 2002
$852k
NIGMS NIH HHS GM37509NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM037509
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability of phototrophs to convert light into biological energy is critical for life on Earth. However, there can be deleterious consequences associated with this bioenergetic conversion, including the production of toxic byproducts. For example, singlet oxygen (1O2) can be formed during photosynthesis by energy transfer from excited triplet-state chlorophyll pigments to O2. By monitoring gene expression and growth in the presence of 1O2, we show that the phototrophic bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides mounts a transcriptional response to this reactive oxygen species (ROS) that requires the alternative sigma factor, sigma(E). An increase in sigma(E) activity is seen when cells are exposed to 1O2 generated either by photochemistry within the photosynthetic apparatus or the photosensitizer, methylene blue. Wavelengths of light responsible for the generating triplet-state chlorophyll pigments in the photosynthetic apparatus are sufficient for a sustained increase in sigma(E) activity. Continued exposure to 1O2 is required to maintain this transcriptional response, and other ROS do not cause a similar increase in sigma(E)-dependent gene expression. When a sigma(E) mutant produces low levels of carotenoids, 1O2 is bacteriocidal, suggesting that this response is essential for protecting cells from this ROS. In addition, global gene expression analysis identified approximately 180 genes (approximately 60 operons) whose RNA levels increase > or = 3-fold in cells with increased sigma(E) activity. Gene products encoded by four newly identified sigma(E)-dependent operons are predicted to be involved in stress response, protecting cells from 1O2 damage, or the conservation of energy.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, BacterialLightbeta-GalactosidaseCarotenoidsMethylene BlueOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPhotosensitizing AgentsPhotosynthesisPromoter Regions, GeneticRhodobacter sphaeroidesSigma FactorSinglet OxygenSpectrophotometryTranscription FactorsTranscription, Geneticbeta-GalactosidaseCarotenoidsMethylene BluePhotosensitizing AgentsSigma FactorSinglet Oxygensporulation-specific sigma factorsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID15855269
PMCPMC1088386
OpenAlexW2106175392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.