ArticleJournal of molecular biology2005
A quantitative description of the binding states and in vitro function of antitermination protein N of bacteriophage lambda.
Article in Journal of molecular biology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- HK022 Nun Requires Arginine-Rich Motif Residues Distinct from λ N.Journal of bacteriology · 2015Article
- The antitermination activity of bacteriophage lambda N protein is controlled by the kinetics of an RNA-looping-facilitated interaction with the transcription complex.Journal of molecular biology · 2008Article
- Bacteriophage P22 antitermination boxB sequence requirements are complex and overlap with those of lambda.Journal of bacteriology · 2008Article
- Mechanisms of physiological regulation of RNA synthesis in bacteria: new discoveries breaking old schemes.Journal of applied genetics · 2007Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The N protein of bacteriophage lambda activates transcription of genes that lie downstream of termination sequences by suppressing transcription termination. N binds to specific (boxB) and non-specific sites on the transcript RNA and contacts RNA polymerase via cis-RNA looping, resulting in "antitermination" of transcription. To find the effect of N-boxB binding on antitermination, we quantitatively relate binding measurements made in isolation to in vitro antitermination activity. We measure binding of N to boxB RNA, non-specific single-stranded RNA, and non-specific double-stranded DNA fluorimetrically, and use an equilibrium model to describe quantitatively the binding of N to nucleic acids of Escherichia coli transcription elongation complexes. We then test the model by comparison with in vitro N antitermination activity measured in reactions containing these same elongation complexes. We find that binding of N protein to the nucleic acid components of transcription elongation complexes can quantitatively predict antitermination activity, suggesting that antitermination in vitro is determined by a nucleic acid binding equilibrium with one molecule of N protein per RNA transcript being sufficient for antitermination. Elongation complexes contain numerous overlapping non-specific RNA and DNA-binding sites for N; the large number of sites compensates for the low N binding affinity, so multiple N proteins are expected to bind to elongation complexes. The occupancy/activity of these proteins is described by a binomial distribution of proteins on transcripts containing multiple non-specific sites. The contribution of specific (boxB) binding to activity also depends on this distribution. Specificity is not measured accurately by measurements made in the presence and in the absence of boxB. We find that antitermination is inhibited by non-productive binding of N to non-specific sites on template DNA, and that NusA protein covers RNA sites on the transcript, limiting N access and activity. The activity and specificity of regulatory proteins that loop from high-affinity binding sites are likely modulated by multiple non-specific binding events; in vivo activity may also be regulated by the modulation of non-specific binding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.