ReviewBMC clinical pharmacology2005
Promiscuous drugs compared to selective drugs (promiscuity can be a virtue).
Review in BMC clinical pharmacology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
59 citing papers in PubMed, 203 citations in OpenAlex.
- Anticancer drug development against ribosome synthesis and the nucleolus.Biochemical Society transactions · 2025Article
- AI-Driven Polypharmacology in Small-Molecule Drug Discovery.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Anticancer Quinolinol Small Molecules Target Multiple Pathways to Promote Cell Death and Eliminate Melanoma Cells Resistant to BRAF Inhibitors.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The Missing Enzymes: A Call to Update Pharmacological Profiling Practices for Better Drug Safety Assessment.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2025Review
- Integration Approaches of UPLC-Q-Exactive Orbitrap-MS/MS, Network Pharmacology Molecular Docking, and Molecular Dynamics to Explore the Effective Constituents and Potential Mechanisms ofCurrent pharmaceutical design · 2025Article
- Improvement of Therapeutic Effect via Inducing Non-Apoptotic Cell Death Using mRNA-Protection Nanocage.Advanced healthcare materials · 2024Article
- Global and regional genetic association analysis of ulcerative colitis and type 2 diabetes mellitus and causal validation analysis of two-sample two-way Mendelian randomization.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Complex synthetic lethality in cancer.Nature genetics · 2023Review
- CORN-Condition Orientated Regulatory Networks: bridging conditions to gene networks.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Identification of Effective and Nonpromiscuous Antidiabetic Drug Molecules fromEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022Article
- Targeted Therapies in Cancer: To Be or Not to Be, Selective.Biomedicines · 2021Review
- Cannabinoids in Audiogenic Seizures: From Neuronal Networks to Future Perspectives for Epilepsy Treatment.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2021Review
- Anti-Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HepG2) Activities of Monoterpene Hydroxy Lactones Isolated from the Marine MicroalgaMarine drugs · 2020Article
- Phenotypic Screening inPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Immune system activation by natural products and complex fractions: a network pharmacology approach in cancer treatment.Cell stress · 2020Review
- A small-molecule competitive inhibitor of phosphatidic acid binding by the AAA+ protein NSF/Sec18 blocks the SNARE-priming stage of vacuole fusion.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2019Article
- 3D-PP: A Tool for Discovering Conserved Three-Dimensional Protein Patterns.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Article
- Exploration of interaction scoring criteria in the CANDO platform.BMC research notes · 2019Article
- Targeting cancer stem cells with dietary phytochemical - Repositioned drug combinations.Cancer letters · 2018Article
- Mechanisms of Phytonutrient Modulation of Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and Inflammation Related to Cancer.Nutrition and cancer · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe word selectivity describes a drug's ability to affect a particular cell population in preference to others. As part of the current state of art in the search for new therapeutic agents, the property of selectivity is a mode of action thought to have a high degree of desirability. Consequently there is a growing activity in this area of research. Selectivity is generally a worthy property in a drug because a drug having high selectivity may have a dramatic effect when there is a single agent that can be targeted against the appropriate molecular-driver involved in the pathogenesis of a disease. An example is chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). CML has a specific chromosomal abnormality, the Philadelphia chromosome, that results in a single gene that produces an abnormal protein. DISCUSSION: There is a burgeoning understanding of the cellular mechanisms that control the etiology and pathogeneses of diseases. This understanding both enables and motivates the development of drugs that induce a specific action in a selected cell population; i.e., a targeted treatment. Consequently, drugs that can target distinct molecular targets involved in pathologic/pathogenetic processes, or signal-transduction pathways, are being developed. However, in most cases, diseases involve multiple abnormalities. A disease may be associated with more than one dysfunctional protein and these may be out-of-balance with each other. Likewise a drug might strongly target a protein that shares a similar active domain with other proteins. A drug may also target pleiotropic cytokines, or other proteins that have multi-physiological functions. In this way multiple normal cellular pathways can be simultaneously influenced. Long term experience with drugs supposedly designed for only a single target, but which unavoidably involve other functional effects, is uncovering the fact that molecular targeting is not medically flawless. SUMMARY: We contend that an ideal drug may be one whose efficacy is based not on the inhibition of a single target, but rather on the rebalancing of the several proteins or events, that contribute to the etiology, pathogeneses, and progression of diseases, i.e., in effect a promiscuous drug. Ideally, if this could be done at minimum drug concentration, side effects could be minimized. Corollaries to this argument are that the growing fervor for researching truly selective drugs may be imprudent when considering the totality of responses; and that the expensive screening techniques used to discover these, may be both medically and financially inefficient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.