Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15851667›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2005

Decoding the genomic tree of life.

Anne B Simonson, Jacqueline A Servin, Ryan G Skophammer, Craig W Herbold, Maria C Rivera, James A Lake

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Decision Making in Plants: A Rooted Perspective.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Eukaryotic origins.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2015
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Rooting gene trees without outgroups: EP rooting.Genome biology and evolution · 2012
    Article
  10. A rooted net of life.Biology direct · 2011
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Archaea--timeline of the third domain.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2011
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. How much of protein sequence space has been explored by life on Earth?Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2008
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Hybrid vigor between native and introduced salamanders raises new challenges for conservation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2007
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anne B SimonsonMolecular Biology Institute, Department of Molecular, Cell, and Developmental Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, 90095, USA.
Jacqueline A Servin
Ryan G Skophammer
Craig W Herbold
Maria C Rivera
James A Lake

Funding

Training Grant in Genomic Analysis and InterpretationT32HG002536 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Valerie A Arboleda, Harold Pimentel · 2002 to 2026
$8.6M
NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG002536
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomes hold within them the record of the evolution of life on Earth. But genome fusions and horizontal gene transfer (HGT) seem to have obscured sufficiently the gene sequence record such that it is difficult to reconstruct the phylogenetic tree of life. HGT among prokaryotes is not random, however. Some genes (informational genes) are more difficult to transfer than others (operational genes). Furthermore, environmental, metabolic, and genetic differences among organisms restrict HGT, so that prokaryotes preferentially share genes with other prokaryotes having properties in common, including genome size, genome G+C composition, carbon utilization, oxygen utilization/sensitivity, and temperature optima, further complicating attempts to reconstruct the tree of life. A new method of phylogenetic reconstruction based on gene presence and absence, called conditioned reconstruction, has improved our prospects for reconstructing prokaryotic evolution. It is also able to detect past genome fusions, such as the fusion that appears to have created the first eukaryote. This genome fusion between a deep branching eubacterium, possibly an ancestor of the cyanobacterium and a proteobacterium, with an archaeal eocyte (crenarchaea), appears to be the result of an early symbiosis. Given new tools and new genes from relevant organisms, it should soon be possible to test current and future fusion theories for the origin of eukaryotes and to discover the general outlines of the prokaryotic tree of life.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenomeAnimalsGene Transfer, HorizontalGenomicsPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID15851667
PMCPMC1131872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.