ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2005
Nuclear markers confirm taxonomic status and relationships among highly endangered and closely related right whale species.
Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genome-Wide Demographic Analyses of Balaenid Whales Revealed Complex History of Gene Flow Associated with Past Climate Oscillation.Genome biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Genetic diversity and phylogeographic patterns of the peacock jewel-damselfly, Rhinocypha fenestrella (Rambur, 1842).PloS one · 2024Article
- Historical Mitogenomic Diversity and Population Structuring of Southern Hemisphere Fin Whales.Genes · 2023Article
- Phylogenomic Resolution of the Cetacean Tree of Life Using Target Sequence Capture.Systematic biology · 2020Article
- A right whale (Mysticeti, Balaenidae) from the Pleistocene of Taiwan.Zoological letters · 2019Article
- Revision of "PeerJ · 2017Article
- Global spatial ecology of three closely-related gadfly petrels.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Fin whale MDH-1 and MPI allozyme variation is not reflected in the corresponding DNA sequences.Ecology and evolution · 2014Article
- Mitogenomic phylogenetics of fin whales (Balaenoptera physalus spp.): genetic evidence for revision of subspecies.PloS one · 2013Article
- Genetic divergence and geographic variation in the deep-water Conus orbignyi complex (Mollusca: Conoidea).Zoologica scripta · 2011Article
- Gene genealogies strongly distorted by weakly interfering mutations in constant environments.Genetics · 2010Article
- Population structure of humpback whales from their breeding grounds in the South Atlantic and Indian Oceans.PloS one · 2009Article
- Testing mitochondrial sequences and anonymous nuclear markers for phylogeny reconstruction in a rapidly radiating group: molecular systematics of the Delphininae (Cetacea: Odontoceti: Delphinidae).BMC evolutionary biology · 2009Article
- Universal markers for comparative mapping and phylogenetic analysis in the Asteraceae (Compositae).TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2007Article
- The evolutionary radiation of Arvicolinae rodents (voles and lemmings): relative contribution of nuclear and mitochondrial DNA phylogenies.BMC evolutionary biology · 2006Article
- Prioritizing species conservation: does the Cape Verde kite exist?Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Right whales (genus: Eubalaena) are among the most endangered mammals, yet their taxonomy and phylogeny have been questioned. A phylogenetic hypothesis based on mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) variation recently prompted a taxonomic revision, increasing the number of right whale species to three. We critically evaluated this hypothesis using sequence data from 13 nuclear DNA (nuDNA) loci as well as the mtDNA control region. Fixed diagnostic characters among the nuclear markers strongly support the hypothesis of three genetically distinct species, despite lack of any diagnostic morphological characters. A phylogenetics analysis of all data produced a strict consensus cladogram with strong support at nodes that define each right whale species as well as relationships among species. Results showed very little conflict among the individual partitions as well as congruence between the mtDNA and nuDNA datasets. These data clearly demonstrate the strength of using numerous independent genetic markers during a phylogenetics analysis of closely related species. In evaluating phylogenetic support contributed by individual loci, 11 of the 14 loci provided support for at least one of the nodes of interest to this study. Only a single marker (mtDNA control region) provided support at all four nodes. A study using any single nuclear marker would have failed to support the proposed phylogeny, and a strong phylogenetic hypothesis was only revealed by the simultaneous analysis of many nuclear loci. In addition, nu DNA and mtDNA data provided complementary levels of support at nodes of different evolutionary depth indicating that the combined use of mtDNA and nuDNA data is both practical and desirable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.