SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2005
Gastro-oesophageal reflux treatment for prolonged non-specific cough in children and adults.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of gastro-oesophageal reflux interventions for chronic cough associated with gastro-oesophageal reflux.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2006Pooled it
- Randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fexuprazan compared with esomeprazole in erosive esophagitis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2022Trial
- Transoral incisionless fundoplication effective in eliminating GERD symptoms in partial responders to proton pump inhibitor therapy at 6 months: the TEMPO Randomized Clinical Trial.Surgical innovation · 2015Trial
- Sensitization profile in differential diagnosis: allergic asthma vs. chronic (nonspecific) cough syndrome.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2013Trial
- Where Eastern Medicine Meets Western Medicine: A World Review of the Management of Chronic Cough.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2026Article
- Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Reflux-like Phenotypes: Using Lyon Consensus 2.0 to Guide Clinical Approach.Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2026Review
- Effectiveness of transoral endoscopic fundoplication with or without hiatal hernia repair in patients with gerd and chronic cough.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Association between clinical and pulmonary function features and diagnosis of cough variant asthma: a case-control study.BMJ open · 2025Observational
- Article
- Chronic tic cough in adults: a case report.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- The Inhibitory Effect ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Pathogenesis and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease-associated cough: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2023Review
- WAO-ARIA consensus on chronic cough - Part III: Management strategies in primary and cough-specialty care.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2022Review
- The Importance of Flexible Bronchoscopy in Difficult-to-treat Asthma from a Pediatric Pulmonology Perspective.Turkish archives of pediatrics · 2022Article
- GERD-related chronic cough: Possible mechanism, diagnosis and treatment.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Review
- Article
- The Cough Reflex: The Janus of Respiratory Medicine.Frontiers in physiology · 2021Review
- Antitussive Effect of a Chest Band in Patients with Interstitial Lung Disease: The Preliminary Results from a Pre-post Intervention Study.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2021Article
- 2019 ERS cough guideline: consensus and controversy.Journal of thoracic disease · 2020Article
- Persistence of chronic cough in a community-based population.ERJ open research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Updated by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCough is a very common symptom presenting to medical practitioners. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is said to be the causative factor in up to 41% of adults with chronic cough. However cough and GORD are common ailments and their co-existence by chance is high. Also cough can induce reflux episodes. Treatment for GORD includes conservative measures (diet manipulation), pharmaceutical therapy (motility or prokinetic agents, H(2) antagonist and proton pump inhibitors (PPI)) and fundoplication.
objectivesTo evaluate the efficacy of GORD treatment on chronic cough in children and adults with GORD and prolonged cough that is not related to an underlying respiratory disease i.e. non-specific chronic cough. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register Collaboration and Cochrane Airways Group, MEDLINE and EMBASE databases, review articles and reference lists of relevant articles were searched. The date of last search was 4th April 2004. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised controlled trials on GORD treatment for cough in children and adults without primary lung disease. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Results of searches were reviewed against pre-determined criteria for inclusion. Two independent reviewers selected, extracted and assessed data for inclusion. Authors were contacted for further information. Data was analysed as "intention to treat" as well as "treatment received". Paediatric and adults data were considered separately. Sensitivity analyses were performed. MAIN
results11 studies (3 paediatric, 8 adults; 383 participants) were included. None of the paediatric studies could be included in meta-analysis. In adults, analysis on use of H(2) antagonist, motility agents and conservative treatment for GORD were not possible (from lack of data) and there were no controlled studies on fundoplication as an intervention. Five adult studies comparing PPI (2-3 months) to placebo were analysed for various outcomes in the meta-analysis. Enrollment of subjects for two studies were primarily from medical clinics and another three studies were otolaryngeal clinic patients. Using "intention to treat", pooled data from three studies resulted in no significant difference between treatment and placebo in total resolution of cough. Pooled data revealed no significant improvement in cough outcomes (end of trial or change in cough scores). Significant differences were only found in sensitivity analysis. A significant improvement in change of cough scores was found in end of intervention (2-3 months) in those receiving PPI with a standardised mean difference of -0.41 (95%CI -0.75, -0.07) using GIV analysis on cross over trials. Two studies reported improvement in cough after 5 days to 2 weeks of treatment. Significant heterogeneity was found between studies using omeprazole and other PPIs. AUTHORS'
conclusionsThere is insufficient evidence to definitely conclude that GORD treatment with PPI is beneficial for cough associated with GORD in adults. The beneficial effect was only seen in sub-analysis and its effect was small. The optimal duration of such a trial of therapy to evaluate response could not be ascertained in the meta-analysis although two RCTs reported significant change by two weeks of therapy. Clinicians should be cognisant of a period (natural resolution with time) and placebo effect in studies that utilise cough as an outcome measure. Data in children are inconclusive. Future paediatric and adult studies are needed whereby studies should be double blind, randomised controlled, parallel design, using treatments for at least two months, with validated subjective and objective cough outcomes and include ascertainment of time to respond as well as assessment of acid and/or non acid reflux whilst on therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.