Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15846722›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2005

Lactase treated feeds to promote growth and feeding tolerance in preterm infants.

C R Y Tan-Dy, A Ohlsson

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

C R Y Tan-DySpecial Care Nursery, Victoria General Hospital, 1 Hospital Way, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, V8Z 6R5. Cherrie.Tan-Dy@caphealth.org
A Ohlsson
University of Toronto · CAVictoria General Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSuccessful transition from parenteral nutrition to full enteral feedings during the immediate neonatal period is associated with improved growth in preterm infants. Lactase is the last of the major intestinal disaccharidases to develop in preterm infants. Because of inadequate lactase activity, preterm infants are unable to digest lactose. Lactase preparations could potentially be used to hydrolyze lactose in formulas and breast milk to minimize lactose malabsorption in preterm infants.

objectivesTo assess the effectiveness and safety of the addition of lactase to milk compared to placebo or no intervention for the promotion of growth and feeding tolerance in preterm infants. PRIMARY OUTCOMES: Weight gain expressed as g/kg/day, growth expressed as weight, length and head circumference percentile for gestational age, assessed at birth and at 40 weeks post-menstrual age, days to achieve full enteral feeds. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Several common outcomes associated with preterm birth, and adverse effects. SEARCH STRATEGY: Electronic and manual searches were conducted in January 2005 of Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2004), MEDLINE (1966-Jan 2005), EMBASE (1980-Jan 2005) and CINAHL (1982-Jan 2005), personal files, bibliographies of identified trials and abstracts by the Pediatric Academic Societies' and the European Society of Pediatric Research Meetings published in Pediatric Research. SELECTION CRITERIA: Types of studies: Randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials.

participantsPreterm infants < 37 weeks gestational age.

interventionAddition of lactase to milk versus placebo or no intervention. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The standard methods of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group were followed independently by the reviewers to assess study quality and report outcomes. Treatment effects, calculated using RevMan 4.2, included relative risk (RR), risk difference (RD) and mean difference (MD), all with 95% confidence intervals (CI). A fixed effect model was used for meta-analyses. Heterogeneity tests were not performed as only one study was identified. MAIN

resultsOne study enrolling 130 infants of 26 - 34 weeks postconceptual age (mean postnatal age at entry 11 days) was identified and no identified study was excluded. The study was a double blind randomized controlled trial of high quality. Lactase treated feeds were initiated when enteral feedings provided > 75% of daily intake. None of the primary outcomes outlined in the protocol for this review and only one of the secondary outcomes, necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), were reported on. The RR for NEC was 0.32 (95% CI 0.32 (0.01, 7.79); the RD was -0.02 (95% CI -0.06, 0.03) (a reduction which was not statistically significant). There was a statistically significant increase in weight gain at study day 10 in the lactase treated feeds group but not at any other time points. Overall, there ws not a statistically significant effect on weight gain. No adverse effects were noted. AUTHORS'

conclusionsThe only randomized trial to date provides no evidence of significant benefit to preterm infants from adding lactase to their feeds. Further research regarding effectiveness and safety are required before practice recommendations can be made. Randomized controlled trials comparing lactase vs placebo treated feeds and enrolling infants when enteral feeds are introduced are recommended. The primary and secondary outcomes for effectiveness and safety should include those identified in this review.

Indexed as

Enteral NutritionParenteral NutritionHumansInfant, NewbornInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaInfant, PrematureLactaseRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicWeight GainLactase

Identifiers

PMID15846722
OpenAlexW4239653273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.