SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2005
Physical measures for treating depression in dialysis patients.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antidepressants for treating depression in adults with end-stage kidney disease treated with dialysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Antidepressants for depression in physically ill people.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010Pooled it
- A study of sertraline in dialysis (ASSertID): a protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial of drug treatment for depression in patients undergoing haemodialysis.BMC nephrology · 2015Trial
- Prevalence and predictors of depression among hemodialysis patients: a prospective follow-up study.BMC public health · 2019Article
- Rocuronium-sugammadex use for electroconvulsive therapy in a hemodialysis patient: a case report.JA clinical reports · 2016Article
- Need for quality improvement in renal systematic reviews.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDepression is the most common psychological problem in the chronic dialysis population. The diagnosis of depression in patients on chronic dialysis is confounded by the fact that several symptoms of uraemia mimic the somatic components of depression. It affects their physical, psychological and social well-being. Furthermore, the frequent occurrence of cardiovascular problems and the pharmacokinetic consequences of renal impairment may make drug treatment of depression difficult.
objectivesThe aim of this systematic review was to assess the efficacy and safety of physical measures in the treatment of depression in patients who are dialysed for end-stage renal disease. SEARCH STRATEGY: A comprehensive search strategy was employed to identify all Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs) relevant to the treatment of depression in patients on chronic dialysis. The following database were searched - MEDLINE (1966-March 2004), EMBASE (1980-March 2004), PSYCHINFO (1872-March 2004), The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2004). Authors of included studies were contacted, reference lists of identified RCTs and relevant narrative reviews were screened. SELECTION CRITERIA: RCTs comparing drugs with placebo or no treatment, or a comparison of drugs against a combination of electroconvulsive therapy and drugs. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were abstracted by two investigators independently onto a standard form and subsequently entered into Review Manager 4.2. Relative risk (RR) for dichotomous data and a (weighted) mean difference (WMD) for continuous data were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). MAIN
resultsOnly one trial, with a total of 12 patients and of eight weeks duration was identified. The trial compared fluoxetine against placebo in depressed patients on chronic dialysis. This study did not show any significant difference in depression scores between the treatment and control groups or safety. AUTHORS'
conclusionsFirm conclusions on the efficacy of physical methods of treatment cannot be made as we identified only one small RCT that was of short duration. More larger and longer term RCTs are needed in this area. Current screening tools for depression are recognised to have poor specificity in the medically ill due to overlap of somatic symptoms of the medical illness. The development of a valid diagnostic tool would be helpful.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.