Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15846672›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2005

Interventions for improving adherence to treatment recommendations in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

E Vermeire, J Wens, P Van Royen, Y Biot, H Hearnshaw, A Lindenmeyer

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04097483 (The TELE-DD Project), which is not on this map. Cited by 96 papers, 27 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
96citing papers in PubMed, 27 pooled it
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04097483 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

The TELE-DD Project: a Nurse-led Randomised Controlled Trial on Treatment Adherence in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Comorbid Depression

TypeinterventionalSponsorAlicia Monreal BartoloméRan2017 to 2020Enrolled428ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2, DepressionArmsTelephone Intervention Group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

96 citing papers in PubMed, 27 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 290 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Effectiveness of Adherence Therapy in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Interventions to improve adherence to lipid-lowering medication.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Pooled it
  19. Pooled it
  20. Pooled it

36 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

E VermeireCentre for General Practice, University of Antwerp, Belgium, Universiteitsplein 1, Antwerpen, Belgium, 2610. etienne.vermeire@ua.ac.be
J Wens
P Van Royen
Y Biot
H Hearnshaw
A Lindenmeyer
University of Antwerp · BEUniversity of Warwick · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResearch suggests adherence to treatment recommendations is low. In type 2 diabetes, which is a chronic condition slowly leading to serious vascular, nephrologic, neurologic and ophthalmological complications, it can be assumed that enhancing adherence to treatment recommendations may lead to a reduction of complications. Treatment regimens in type 2 diabetes are complicated, encompassing life-style adaptations and medication intake.

objectivesTo assess the effects of interventions for improving adherence to treatment recommendations in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. SEARCH STRATEGY: Studies were obtained from searches of multiple electronic bibliographic databases supplemented with hand searches of references. Date of last search: November 2002. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled and controlled clinical trials, before-after studies and epidemiological studies, assessing changes in adherence to treatment recommendations, as defined in the objectives section, were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two teams of reviewers independently assessed the trials identified for inclusion. Three teams of two reviewers assessed trial quality and extracted data. The analysis for the narrative part was performed by one reviewer (EV), the meta-analysis by two reviewers (EV, JW). MAIN

resultsTwentyone studies assessing interventions aiming at improving adherence to treatment recommendations, not to diet or exercise recommendations, in people living with type 2 diabetes in primary care, outpatient settings, community and hospital settings, were included. Outcomes evaluated in these studies were heterogeneous, there was a variety of adherence measurement instruments. Nurse led interventions, home aids, diabetes education, pharmacy led interventions, adaptation of dosing and frequency of medication taking showed a small effect on a variety of outcomes including HbA1c. No data on mortality and morbidity, nor on quality of life could be found. AUTHORS'

conclusionsCurrent efforts to improve or to facilitate adherence of people with type 2 diabetes to treatment recommendations do not show significant effects nor harms. The question whether any intervention enhances adherence to treatment recommendations in type 2 diabetes effectively, thus still remains unanswered.

Indexed as

Patient ComplianceDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Health BehaviorHumansPatient Education as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID15846672
PMCPMC9022438
OpenAlexW1539546175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.