SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2005
Inhaled fluticasone versus placebo for chronic asthma in adults and children.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Outpatient Respiratory Management of Infants, Children, and Adolescents with Post-Prematurity Respiratory Disease: An Official American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2021Guideline
- Fluticasone at different doses for chronic asthma in adults and children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2008Pooled it
- Fluticasone versus HFA-beclomethasone dipropionate for chronic asthma in adults and children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2006Pooled it
- Glucocorticoid therapy in respiratory illness: bench to bedside.Journal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research · 2022Review
- Effects of systemic versus local administration of corticosteroids on mucosal tolerance.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2012Article
- Asthma control in adolescents: role of leukotriene inhibitors.Adolescent health, medicine and therapeutics · 2010Review
- Adrenal responses to low dose synthetic ACTH (Synacthen) in children receiving high dose inhaled fluticasone.Archives of disease in childhood · 2006Article
- Overcoming gaps in the management of asthma in older patients: new insights.Drugs & aging · 2005Review
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) is a relatively new inhaled corticosteroid for the treatment of asthma.
objectives1. To assess efficacy and safety outcomes in studies that compared FP to placebo for treatment of chronic asthma.2. To explore the presence of a dose-response effect. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Trial Register (January 2004), reference lists of articles, contacted trialists and searched abstracts of major respiratory society meetings (1997-2004). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials in children and adults comparing FP to placebo in the treatment of chronic asthma. Two reviewers independently assessed articles for inclusion and methodological quality. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers extracted data. Quantitative analyses where undertaken using RevMan Analyses 4.2.7. MAIN
resultsSixty eight studies met the inclusion criteria (11, 104 participants). Methodological quality was high. In non-oral steroid treated asthmatics with mild and moderate disease FP resulted in improvements from baseline compared with placebo across all dose ranges (100 to 1000 mcg/d) in FEV1 (between 0.13 to 0.45 litres); morning PEF (between 27 and 47 L/min); symptom scores (based on a standardised scale, between 0.5 and 0.85); reduction in rescue beta-2 agonist use (between 1.2 and 2.2 puffs/d). High dose FP reduced the number of patients dependent on prednisolone: FP 1000-1500 mcg/d Peto Odds Ratio 0.07 (95% CI 0.05 to 0.10). FP at all doses led to a greater likelihood of sore throat, hoarseness and oral Candidiasis, but 21 patients would need to be treated for one extra to develop Candidiasis (FP 500 mcg/day), whilst only three or four patients need to be treated to avoid one extra patient being withdrawn due to lack of efficacy at all doses of FP. AUTHORS'
conclusionsDoses of FP in the range 100-1000 mcg/d are effective. In most patients with mild-moderate asthma improvements with low dose FP are only a little less than those associated with high doses when compared with placebo. High dose FP appears to have worthwhile oral-corticosteroid reducing properties. FP use is accompanied by an increased likelihood of oropharyngeal side effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.