Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15846640›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2005

Corticosteroids for myasthenia gravis.

C Schneider-Gold, P Gajdos, K V Toyka, R R Hohlfeld

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 165 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Acetylcholinesterase inhibitor treatment for myasthenia gravis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  5. Thymectomy for non-thymomatous myasthenia gravis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  6. Immunosuppressive agents for myasthenia gravis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2007
    Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Comorbidity in myasthenia gravis: multicentric, hospital-based, and controlled study of 178 Italian patients.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Adverse Side Effects Associated with Corticosteroid Therapy: A Study in 39 Patients with Generalized Myasthenia Gravis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

C Schneider-Gold
P Gajdos
K V Toyka
R R Hohlfeld
Hôpital Raymond-Poincaré · FRUniversity of Göttingen · DEUniversity of Würzburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough widely accepted as an appropriate immunosuppressive therapy, the efficacy of glucocorticosteroid treatment has only rarely been tested in controlled studies.

objectivesTo assess the efficacy of glucocorticosteroids or adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) medication in autoimmune myasthenia gravis. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Trials Register in July 2004, MEDLINE (from January 1966 to June 2004) and EMBASE (from January 1980 to June 2004). We also checked the bibliographies in reviews and the randomised trials and contacted their authors to identify additional published and unpublished data. SELECTION CRITERIA: From the articles identified we selected those open or controlled studies which allowed us to assess the outcome of treated and untreated patients at definite endpoints. Types of studies: quasi-randomised or randomised controlled trials. TYPES OF

participantspatients with myasthenia gravis of all ages and all degrees of severity. Types of interventions: any form of glucocorticosteroids or adrenocorticotrophic hormone treatment. Types of outcome measures:Primary outcome(1) improvement after at least three months in either the weakest muscles or all muscles. Secondary outcomes(1) proportion of patients improved after at least six months(2) proportion of patients in remission(3) number of episodes of worsening during the first six months(4) acetylcholine receptor antibody titres after at least three months of therapy. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Three authors extracted the data from the selected articles and one other checked them. MAIN

resultsA trial of adrenocorticotrophic hormone (43 patients) did not show any advantage compared with placebo for the treatment of ocular myasthenia gravis. Two double-blind trials compared prednisone with placebo for generalised myasthenia gravis. In the first (13 patients), the improvement was slightly greater in the prednisone group at six months. In the second (20 patients) which was a short-term trial, the improvement was significantly greater at two weeks. Two trials compared glucocorticosteroids with azathioprine (41 and 10 patients respectively). In one of these the rate of treatment failure was greater in the prednisone group. In a trial of glucocorticosteroids versus intravenous immunoglobulin (33 patients) no differences in treatment responses were encountered during a treatment period of 14 days. An open trial (39 patients) evaluating different corticosteroid doses revealed a shorter time to improvement in the high-dose group. However only limited evidence can be drawn from the available randomised controlled trials due to numerous and important methodological flaws. AUTHORS'

conclusionsLimited evidence from randomised controlled trials suggests that corticosteroid treatment offers significant short-term benefit in myasthenia gravis compared with placebo. This supports the conclusions of observational studies and expert opinion. Limited evidence from randomised controlled trials does not show any difference in efficacy between corticosteroids and either azathioprine or intravenous immunoglobulin.

Indexed as

Adrenal Cortex HormonesAdrenocorticotropic HormoneAzathioprineGlucocorticoidsHumansImmunoglobulins, IntravenousMethylprednisoloneMyasthenia GravisPrednisoneRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAdrenal Cortex HormonesAdrenocorticotropic HormoneAzathioprineGlucocorticoidsImmunoglobulins, IntravenousMethylprednisolonePrednisone

Identifiers

PMID15846640
PMCPMC8406927
OpenAlexW2121758832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.