Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15846631›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2005

Hormone replacement therapy for preventing cardiovascular disease in post-menopausal women.

Sánchez R Gabriel, L Carmona, M Roque, Gómez L M Sánchez, X Bonfill

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Short-term and long-term effects of tibolone in postmenopausal women.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  3. Black cohosh (Cimicifuga spp.) for menopausal symptoms.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Guideline
  8. Pooled it
  9. Review
  10. A Review of Challenges and Opportunities in Machine Learning for Health.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Using genetic variation for establishing causality of cardiovascular risk factors: overcoming confounding and reverse causality.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2014
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Evidence based medicine series: evidence based medicine: an overview.Malaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia · 2009
    Review
  17. The compass, crow's nest and ship of medicine in the sea of uncertainties.Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina · 2009
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Computed tomography screening for lung cancer.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2007
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sánchez R Gabriel
L Carmona
M Roque
Gómez L M Sánchez
X Bonfill
Hospital de Sant Pau · ESHospital Universitario de La Princesa · ESServicio Gallego de Salud · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is apparently compelling evidence, from observational studies, that hormone replacement therapy (HRT) may have benefits in reducing cardiovascular events in post-menopausal women. However, these observational data are subject to biases and confounding and require support from formally designed randomised controlled trials of the effects of HRT on cardiovascular disease risk.

objectivesTo assess the effects of HRT for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases in post-menopausal women. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched MEDLINE (1998 to December 2002)), EMBASE (1998 to December 2002), the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (CCTR) (Issue 4 2002), the National Research Register (1998 to present), Clinical Trials.gov (1998 to present), and the database of Spanish Clinical Trials (1998 to present) and reference lists of articles. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials comparing HRT with controls (placebo or no treatment) with a minimum follow up of 6 months for treating or preventing cardiovascular disease in postmenopausal women with or without cardiovascular disease. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Three independent reviewers extracted information from the articles, solving discrepancies by consensus. All outcomes studied were dichotomous. Risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for each study and plotted. Random effects meta-analysis was used in efficacy outcomes (cardiovascular events) and fixed-effects meta-analysis in variables regarding side effects (deep venous thrombosis). MAIN

resultsNo protective effect of HRT was seen for any of the cardiovascular outcomes assessed: all cause mortality, cardiovascular death, non-fatal MI, venous thromboemboli or stroke. Higher risks of venous thromboembolic events (Relative risk (RR) 2.15, 95% CI 1.61 to 2.86), pulmonary embolus (RR 2.15, 95% CI 1.41 to 3.28), and stroke (RR 1.44, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.89) was found in those randomised to HRT compared with placebo. No substantial heterogeneity (p <0.1) was detected in any of the outcomes studied. AUTHORS'

conclusionsAt present, a recommendation for initiating HRT for the reason of preventing cardiovascular events in post-menopausal women (with or without cardiovascular disease) should not be made. Women with other risk factors for venous thromboembolic events should be discouraged from using HRT if the sole goal is to prevent cardiovascular events.

Indexed as

Estrogen Replacement TherapyCardiovascular DiseasesFemaleHormone Replacement TherapyHumansPostmenopause

Identifiers

PMID15846631
PMCPMC4164473
OpenAlexW1788480120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.