Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15846630›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2005

Operative procedures for fissure in ano.

R Nelson

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. V-Y advancement flap as first-line treatment for all chronic anal fissures.International journal of colorectal disease · 2010
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Idiopathic hypertensive anal canal: a place of internal sphincterotomy.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2009
    Trial
  5. Glyceryl trinitrate ointment (0.25%) and anal cryothermal dilators in the treatment of chronic anal fissures.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2009
    Trial
  6. Medical and surgical treatment of chronic anal fissure: a prospective study.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2007
    Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Conservative and surgical treatment of chronic anal fissure: prospective longer term results.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2010
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A review of chronic anal fissure management.Techniques in coloproctology · 2007
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 2 countries.

R NelsonSurgery, University of Illinois, 1740 West Taylor, Room 2204 m/c 957, Chicago, Illinois 60612, USA. altohorn@uic.edu
University of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOperative techniques commonly used for fissure in ano include: anal stretch, open lateral sphincterotomy, closed lateral sphincterotomy, posterior midline sphincterotomy and to a lesser extent dermal flap coverage of the fissure. Reports of direct comparisons between operative techniques for anal fissure are variable in their results. These reports are either subject to selection bias (in non-randomized studies) or observer bias (in all studies) or have inadequate numbers of patients enrolled to answer the question of efficacy.

objectivesTo determine the best technique for fissure surgery. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and MEDLINE (1965-2005) were searched. The list of cited references in all included reports and several study authors also were helpful in finding additional comparative studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: All reports in which there was a direct comparison between at least two operative techniques were reviewed and when more than one report existed for any given pair, that report was included. If crude data were not presented in the report, the authors were contacted and crude data obtained. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The two most commonly used end points in all reported studies were persistence of the fissure and post operative incontinence of flatus. These are the only two endpoints included in the meta-analysis. MAIN

resultsTwenty-four trials encompassing 3475 patients are included in this review . Anal stretch has a higher risk of fissure persistence than internal sphincterotomy and also a significantly higher risk of minor incontinence than sphincterotomy. The combined results of open versus closed partial lateral internal sphincterotomy show little difference between the two procedures both in fissure persistence and risk of incontinence. AUTHORS'

conclusionsAnal stretch and posterior midline internal sphincterotomy should probably be abandoned in the treatment of chronic anal fissure in adults. For those patients requiring surgery for anal fissure, open and closed partial lateral internal sphincterotomy appear to be equally efficacious. More data are needed to assess the effectiveness of posterior internal sphincterotomy, anterior levatorplasty, wound suture or papilla excision.

Indexed as

Anal CanalFissure in AnoFlatulenceHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID15846630
OpenAlexW4244107661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.