Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15846607›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2005

Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting for vertebral artery stenosis.

L J Coward, R L Featherstone, M M Brown

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Imaging of vertebral artery stenosis: a systematic review.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2007
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Safety and efficacy of different stent types for the endovascular therapy of extracranial vertebral artery disease.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2014
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

L J Coward
R L Featherstone
M M Brown
University College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurgery for vertebral artery stenosis is technically difficult, potentially hazardous and is not considered in most centres. There is growing evidence from case series that vertebral artery stenosis may be treated endovascularly by percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting. This may be a feasible alternative to surgery to relieve symptoms caused by significant stenosis.

objectivesThe objective of this review was to assess the safety and efficacy of vertebral artery percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, with or without stenting, combined with medical care, compared to medical care alone, in patients with vertebral artery stenosis. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group's trials register (last searched 28 July 2004). In addition we searched the following bibliographic databases: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2002), MEDLINE (1966 to July 2004), EMBASE (1980 to July 2004), and Science Citation Index (1981 to July 2004). We also contacted researchers in the field, and balloon catheter and stent manufacturers. SELECTION CRITERIA: We selected randomised trials of endovascular treatment of vertebral artery stenosis combined with best medical therapy, compared with best medical therapy alone, in patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic vertebral artery stenosis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently applied the inclusion criteria, extracted data and assessed trial quality. MAIN

resultsOne completed randomised trial was found. In one subgroup of this trial, 16 patients with symptomatic severe vertebral artery stenosis were randomised to endovascular treatment (n = 8) or medical treatment alone (n = 8). There were no strokes in any arterial territory or deaths from any cause in either group within 30 days of treatment (endovascular group) or 30 days of randomisation (medical group). In the endovascular group, two patients had a posterior circulation TIA at the time of the procedure. In the endovascular group, the mean vessel stenosis at follow up was 47% (range 0% to 80%). Patients were followed up for a mean of 4.5 years in the endovascular group and 4.9 years in the medical group. There were no further vertebrobasilar territory strokes in either group for the duration of follow up. Morbidity and mortality was related to carotid and coronary artery disease in this study. AUTHORS'

conclusionsThere is currently insufficient evidence to assess the effects of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with or without stenting or primary stenting for vertebral artery stenosis.

Indexed as

StentsAngioplasty, BalloonHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicVertebrobasilar Insufficiency

Identifiers

PMID15846607
PMCPMC7045393
OpenAlexW2156310817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.