ReviewArchives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition2005
Quality of care by neonatal nurse practitioners: a review of the Ashington experiment.
Review in Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Characterising the outcomes, impacts and implementation challenges of advanced clinical practice roles in the UK: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Inpatient care of small and sick newborns: a multi-country analysis of health system bottlenecks and potential solutions.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2015Article
- Examining professional boundaries between nurses and physicians in neonatal intensive care units.Israel journal of health policy research · 2014Article
- Master's programs in advanced nursing practice: new strategies to enhance course design for subspecialty training in neonatology and pediatrics.Advances in medical education and practice · 2012Article
- How effectively can clinical examination pick up congenital heart disease at birth?Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition · 2006Review
- How effectively can clinical examination pick up congenital heart disease at birth?Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition · 2006Article
- Can all neonatal resuscitation be managed by nurse practitioners?Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition · 2006Article
- The Advancement of Nurses is the Advancement of Medicine: A Personal Experience from Israel.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Ashington experiment, an innovative neonatal service run entirely by advanced neonatal nurse practitioners (ANNPs), has been evaluated. This is a report of that evaluation and a review of the benefits, hazards, and implications of nurse practitioner led services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.