Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15845980›Full record

ReviewBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2005

Principles for international registration of protocol information and results from human trials of health related interventions: Ottawa statement (part 1).

Karmela Krleza-Jerić, An-Wen Chan, Kay Dickersin, Ida Sim, Jeremy Grimshaw, Christian Gluud

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 80 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Industry sponsorship and research outcome.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Guideline
  7. Pooled it
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. [Interpretation and Examples: Key Updates in SPIRIT 2025 Statement].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Karmela Krleza-JerićRandomised Controlled Trials Unit, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Ottawa, 160 Elgin Street, Ottawa ON, K1A 0W9, Canada. kkrleza-jeric@cihr-irsc.gc.ca
An-Wen Chan
Kay Dickersin
Ida Sim
Jeremy Grimshaw
Christian Gluud

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

RegistriesClinical ProtocolsClinical Trials as TopicDisclosureHumansInternational CooperationTime FactorsBiomedical and Behavioral Research

Identifiers

PMID15845980
PMCPMC556346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.