Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15843456›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the rheumatic diseases2005

Performance of health status measures with a pen based personal digital assistant.

T K Kvien, P Mowinckel, T Heiberg, K L Dammann, Ø Dale, G J Aanerud, T N Alme, T Uhlig

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. A meta-analytic review of measurement equivalence study findings of the SF-36® and SF-12® Health Surveys across electronic modes compared to paper administration.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2018
    Pooled it
  5. Pain Assessment--Can it be Done with a Computerised System? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2016
    Pooled it
  6. Equivalence and measurement properties of an electronic version of the Psoriasis Symptom Inventory.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2014
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Personal digital assistants to collect tuberculosis bacteriology data in Peru reduce delays, errors, and workload, and are acceptable to users: cluster randomized controlled trial.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2009
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

T K KvienDepartment of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway. t.k.kvien@medisin.uio.no
P Mowinckel
T Heiberg
K L Dammann
Ø Dale
G J Aanerud
T N Alme
T Uhlig

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncreasing use of self reported health status in clinical practice and research, as well as patient appreciation of monitoring fluctuations of health over time, suggest a need for more frequent collection of data. Electronic use of health status measures in the follow up of patients is a possible way to achieve this.

objectiveTo compare self reported health status measures in a personal digital assistant (PDA) version and a paper/pencil version for test-retest reliability, agreement between scores, and feasibility.

methods30 patients with stable rheumatoid arthritis (mean age 61.6 years, range 49.8 to 70.0; mean disease duration, 16.7 years; 63% female; 67% rheumatoid factor positive; 46.6% on disease modifying antirheumatic drugs) completed self reported health status measures (pain, fatigue, and global health on visual analogue scales (VAS), rheumatoid arthritis disease activity index, modified health assessment questionnaire, SF-36) in a conventional paper based questionnaire version and on a PDA (HP iPAQ, model h5450). Completion was repeated after five to seven days.

resultsTest-retest reliability was similar, as evaluated by the Bland-Altman approach, the coefficient of variation, and intraclass correlation coefficients. The scores showed acceptable agreement, but with a slight tendency to higher scores on VAS with the PDA than the paper/pencil version. No significant differences were seen for measures of feasibility (time to complete, satisfaction score), but 65.5% preferred PDA, 20.7% preferred paper, and 13.8% had no preference.

conclusionsThe clinimetric performance of paper/pencil versions of self reported health status measures was similar to an electronic version, using an inexpensive PDA.

Indexed as

Computers, HandheldHealth Status IndicatorsMedical Records Systems, ComputerizedAgedArthritis, RheumatoidAttitude to ComputersFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementReproducibility of ResultsSelf DisclosureSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID15843456
PMCPMC1755226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.