Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15842549›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2005

Spironolactone reduces brachial pulse wave velocity and PIIINP levels in hypertensive diabetic patients.

J Davies, A Gavin, M Band, A Morris, A Struthers

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2005
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J DaviesDivision of Medicine and Therapeutics, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, UK. j.i.davies@dundee.ac.uk
A Gavin
M Band
A Morris
A Struthers
Ninewells Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo assess whether spironolactone has beneficial effects on blood pressure (BP), N-terminal propeptide of type III procollagen (PIIINP) and pulse wave velocity (PWV) in hypertensive, type II diabetics.

methodsTen patients with type II diabetes and hypertension were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind crossover study comparing 4 months' treatment with spironolactone and placebo with a 4-week washout phase. BP, PIIINP and carotid-radial PWV were measured at the end of each treatment phase.

resultsCompared with placebo, spironolactone reduced systolic BP by 15.6 +/- 46.1 mmHg (P = 0.005, 95% CI 2.7-28.5 mmHg), PIIINP by 0.6 +/- 0.3 microg l(-1) (P = 0.04, 95% CI 0.02-1.1 microg l(-1)) and PWV by 0.6 +/- 0.2 m s(-1) (P = 0.008, 95% CI 0.18-1.02 m s(-1)).

conclusionsSpironolactone is effective at reducing systolic BP and brachial artery stiffness as indicated by PWV. It also reduces PIIINP in type II diabetic patients with hypertension.

Indexed as

AgedBlood Flow VelocityBlood PressureCross-Over StudiesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic AngiopathiesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansHypertensionMaleMineralocorticoid Receptor AntagonistsPeptide FragmentsProcollagenPulseSpironolactoneMineralocorticoid Receptor AntagonistsPeptide FragmentsProcollagenprocollagen Type III-N-terminal peptideSpironolactone

Identifiers

PMID15842549
PMCPMC1884841
OpenAlexW1976819546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.