Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15839718›Full record

ReviewDrugs & aging2005

Pharmacological management of allergic rhinitis in the elderly: safety issues with oral antihistamines.

Juga Hansen, Ludger Klimek, Karl Hörmann

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs & aging, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Racial differences in anticholinergic use among community-dwelling elders.The Consultant pharmacist : the journal of the American Society of Consultant Pharmacists · 2015
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Allergic diseases in the elderly.Clinical and translational allergy · 2011
    Article
  14. Rhinitis in the geriatric population.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2010
    Article
  15. Review
  16. H1 antihistamines: current status and future directions.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2008
    Article
  17. Rhinitis in the elderly.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2006
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Juga HansenEar, Nose and Throat Department, Mannheim University Hospital, Mannheim, Germany.
Ludger Klimek
Karl Hörmann
University Medical Centre Mannheim · DEUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An increasing number of elderly persons in our society experience allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. Different agents are used in the pharmacological treatment of allergic rhinitis, with histamine H1 receptor antagonists (antihistamines) being the most frequently prescribed class. However, drug therapy of aged persons differs to a degree from that in other age groups primarily because of quantitative pharmacotherapeutic problems. The main problems are co-morbidities and polymedication, which may lead to drug-drug interactions. H1 receptor antagonists block the action of histamine at specific receptors and are available for both topical and systemic administration. First-generation H1 receptor antagonists are lipophilic and therefore may cross the blood-brain barrier; they also lack specificity for the H1 receptor. Second-generation H1 receptor antagonists have reduced capacity to cross the blood-brain barrier and greater specificity for the H1 receptor. Use of first-generation H1 receptor antagonists in the elderly should be considered carefully because of the large number of adverse effects and potential for interactions with these agents. Second-generation H1 receptor antagonists such as desloratadine, levocetirizine and ebastine provide good selective H1 receptor blockade without anticholinergic or alpha-adrenoceptor antagonist activity. Furthermore, they inhibit proinflammatory cytokines and are safe. Second-generation H1 receptor antagonists also offer therapeutic possibilities in patients with severe liver and/or renal dysfunction.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAgedConjunctivitis, AllergicContraindicationsHistamine H1 AntagonistsHumansRespiratory HypersensitivityRhinitisHistamine H1 Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID15839718
OpenAlexW2207110300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.