Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15838685›Full record

Trial reportDiabetologia2005

Dietary manipulation of beta cell autoimmunity in infants at increased risk of type 1 diabetes: a pilot study.

H K Akerblom, S M Virtanen, J Ilonen, E Savilahti, O Vaarala, A Reunanen, K Teramo, A-M Hämäläinen, J Paronen, M-A Riikjärv and 6 more

Erratum issued 2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Diabetologia, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00179777 nacompletednot on this map

TRIGR - Trial to Reduce IDDM in the Genetically at Risk

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of HelsinkiRan2002 to 2017Enrolled5,156ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1ArmsHydrolysed infant formula, Nonhydrolysed infant formula
NCT00570102 phase2completednot on this map

Trial to Reduce IDDM in the Genetically at Risk (TRIGR): the Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of HelsinkiRan1995 to 2008Enrolled230ConditionsType 1 Diabetes MellitusArmsA highly hydrolyzed formula, A regular cow's milk based formula
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 147 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Prevention of Type 1 Diabetes in Children: A Worthy Challenge?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Progress in immune-based therapies for type 1 diabetes.Clinical and experimental immunology · 2013
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
    Riikjärv, MA [added]; Ormisson, A [added]; Ludvigsson, J [added]; Dosch, HM [added]; Hakulinen, T [added]; Knip, M [added]
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 11 institutions in 4 countries.

H K AkerblomHospital for Children and Adolescents, Biomedicum Helsinki, University of Helsinki, Haartmaninkatu 8, PO Box 700, 00029 Helsinki, Finland. hans.akerblom@helsinki.fi
S M Virtanen
J Ilonen
E Savilahti
O Vaarala
A Reunanen
K Teramo
A-M Hämäläinen
J Paronen
M-A Riikjärv
A Ormisson
J Ludvigsson
H-M Dosch
T Hakulinen
M Knip
National TRIGR Study Groups
University of Helsinki · FIFinnish Cancer Registry · FIHelsinki University Hospital · FIInstitute for Molecular Medicine Finland · FILinköping University · SESickKids Foundation · CATallinn Health Care College · EETampere University Hospital · FIUniversity of Oulu · FIUniversity of Tartu · EEUniversity of Turku · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aims/hypothesisWe aimed to assess the feasibility of a dietary intervention trial with weaning to hydrolysed formula in infants at increased risk of type 1 diabetes and to study the effect of the intervention on the emergence of diabetes-associated autoantibodies in early childhood.

methodsWe studied 242 newborn infants who had a first-degree relative with type 1 diabetes and carried risk-associated HLA-DQB1 alleles. After exclusive breastfeeding, the infants underwent a double-blind, randomised pilot trial of either casein hydrolysate (Nutramigen; Mead Johnson) or conventional cow's milk-based formula until the age of 6-8 months. During a mean observation period of 4.7 years, autoantibodies to insulin, anti-glutamic acid decarboxylase and insulinoma-associated antigen-2 were measured by radiobinding assays, and islet cell antibodies (ICA) by immunofluorescence.

resultsThe feasibility of screening and identifying a cohort of first-degree relatives with HLA-conferred disease susceptibility, enrolling them in a dietary intervention trial and following them for seroconversion to autoantibody positivity is established. The cumulative incidence of autoantibodies was somewhat smaller in the casein hydrolysate vs control formula group, suggesting the need for a larger well-powered study. After adjustment for duration of study formula feeding, life-table analysis showed a significant protection by the intervention from positivity for ICA (p=0.02) and at least one autoantibody (p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS/

interpretationThe present study provides the first evidence ever in man, despite its limited power, that it may be possible to manipulate spontaneous beta cell autoimmunity by dietary intervention in infancy.

Indexed as

AutoimmunityDiet, DiabeticAutoantibodiesBody HeightBody WeightBreast FeedingChildChild, PreschoolDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Double-Blind MethodFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHLA-DQ AntigensHLA-DQ beta-ChainsHumansInfantAutoantibodiesHLA-DQ AntigensHLA-DQB1 antigenHLA-DQ beta-Chains

Identifiers

PMID15838685
OpenAlexW2148297845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.