Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15834150›Full record

ArticleGenetics2005

Genetic linkage maps of the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum, based on bacterial artificial chromosomes and expressed sequence tags.

Marcé D Lorenzen, Zaldy Doyungan, Joel Savard, Kathy Snow, Lindsey R Crumly, Teresa D Shippy, Jeffrey J Stuart, Susan J Brown, Richard W Beeman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Marcé D LorenzenU.S. Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service-GMPRC, Manhattan, Kansas 66502, USA.
Zaldy Doyungan
Joel Savard
Kathy Snow
Lindsey R Crumly
Teresa D Shippy
Jeffrey J Stuart
Susan J Brown
Richard W Beeman

Funding

GENETIC CONTROL OF SEGMENTATIONR01HD029594 · NICHD · KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BROWN, SUSAN J. · 1992 to 2011
$3.4M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD029594
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A genetic linkage map was constructed in a backcross family of the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum, based largely on sequences from bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) ends and untranslated regions from random cDNA's. In most cases, dimorphisms were detected using heteroduplex or single-strand conformational polymorphism analysis after specific PCR amplification. The map incorporates a total of 424 markers, including 190 BACs and 165 cDNA's, as well as 69 genes, transposon insertion sites, sequence-tagged sites, microsatellites, and amplified fragment-length polymorphisms. Mapped loci are distributed along 571 cM, spanning all 10 linkage groups at an average marker separation of 1.3 cM. This genetic map provides a framework for positional cloning and a scaffold for integration of the emerging physical map and genome sequence assembly. The map and corresponding sequences can be accessed through BeetleBase (http://www.bioinformatics.ksu.edu/BeetleBase/).

Indexed as

Genetic LinkageAnimalsChromosome MappingChromosomes, Artificial, BacterialCrosses, GeneticDatabases, GeneticDNADNA, ComplementaryDNA Transposable ElementsExpressed Sequence TagsFemaleInternetMaleMicrosatellite RepeatsModels, GeneticMolecular Sequence DataDNADNA, ComplementaryDNA Transposable ElementsNucleic Acid Heteroduplexes

Identifiers

PMID15834150
PMCPMC1450394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.