Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15833126›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2005

Pilot Anopheles gambiae full-length cDNA study: sequencing and initial characterization of 35,575 clones.

Shawn M Gomez, Karin Eiglmeier, Beatrice Segurens, Pierre Dehoux, Arnaud Couloux, Claude Scarpelli, Patrick Wincker, Jean Weissenbach, Paul T Brey, Charles W Roth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Shawn M GomezUnité de Biochimie et Biologie Moléculaire des Insectes and CNRS FRE 2849, Institut Pasteur, 75724 Paris Cedex 15, France. sgomez@pasteur.fr
Karin Eiglmeier
Beatrice Segurens
Pierre Dehoux
Arnaud Couloux
Claude Scarpelli
Patrick Wincker
Jean Weissenbach
Paul T Brey
Charles W Roth

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We describe the preliminary analysis of over 35,000 clones from a full-length enriched cDNA library from the malaria mosquito vector Anopheles gambiae. The clones define nearly 3,700 genes, of which around 2,600 significantly improve current gene definitions. An additional 17% of the genes were not previously annotated, suggesting that an equal percentage may be missing from the current Anopheles genome annotation.

Indexed as

Cloning, MolecularSequence Analysis, DNAAnimalsAnophelesBase CompositionDNA, ComplementaryGenes, InsectOpen Reading FramesPeptidoglycanPhylogenyPilot ProjectsProtein Structure, TertiarySequence AlignmentDNA, ComplementaryPeptidoglycan

Identifiers

PMID15833126
PMCPMC1088967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.