Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15833120›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2005

Promoter features related to tissue specificity as measured by Shannon entropy.

Jonathan Schug, Winfried-Paul Schuller, Claudia Kappen, J Michael Salbaum, Maja Bucan, Christian J Stoeckert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 268 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
268citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

268 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. LncRNA Recognition-Associated CpG Island Detection and Methylation Analysis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Quantifying transcriptome diversity: a review.Briefings in functional genomics · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

208 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jonathan SchugCenter for Bioinformatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. jschug@pcbi.upenn.edu
Winfried-Paul Schuller
Claudia Kappen
J Michael Salbaum
Maja Bucan
Christian J Stoeckert

Funding

HIGH THROUGHPUT ANNOTATION OF GENOMIC DNA SEQUENCER01HG001539 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI STOECKERT, CHRISTIAN J. · 1997 to 2003
$2.1M
Genome-wide discovery of beta cell gene control elementsR01DK063336 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI KAPPEN, CLAUDIA T. · 2002 to 2004
$1.6M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG001539NHGRI NIH HHS R01HG001539NIDDK NIH HHS 1R01DK63336NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK063336
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe regulatory mechanisms underlying tissue specificity are a crucial part of the development and maintenance of multicellular organisms. A genome-wide analysis of promoters in the context of gene-expression patterns in tissue surveys provides a means of identifying the general principles for these mechanisms.

resultsWe introduce a definition of tissue specificity based on Shannon entropy to rank human genes according to their overall tissue specificity and by their specificity to particular tissues. We apply our definition to microarray-based and expressed sequence tag (EST)-based expression data for human genes and use similar data for mouse genes to validate our results. We show that most genes show statistically significant tissue-dependent variations in expression level. We find that the most tissue-specific genes typically have a TATA box, no CpG island, and often code for extracellular proteins. As expected, CpG islands are found in most of the least tissue-specific genes, which often code for proteins located in the nucleus or mitochondrion. The class of genes with no CpG island or TATA box are the most common mid-specificity genes and commonly code for proteins located in a membrane. Sp1 was found to be a weak indicator of less-specific expression. YY1 binding sites, either as initiators or as downstream sites, were strongly associated with the least-specific genes.

conclusionsWe have begun to understand the components of promoters that distinguish tissue-specific from ubiquitous genes, to identify associations that can predict the broad class of gene expression from sequence data alone.

Indexed as

EntropyAnimalsBase CompositionBinding SitesCluster AnalysisCpG IslandsGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationGenesHumansMiceOrgan SpecificityPromoter Regions, GeneticSp1 Transcription FactorTATA BoxTranscription FactorsSp1 Transcription FactorTranscription FactorsYY1 Transcription Factor

Identifiers

PMID15833120
PMCPMC1088961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.