Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15831880›Full record

ReviewBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2005

Young people's health: the need for action.

Russell M Viner, Maggie Barker

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Interactive computer-based interventions for sexual health promotion.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010
    Pooled it
  3. An Interpretive Phenomenological Inquiry into Type 1 Diabetes and Work.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Pre-exposure prophylaxis as an opportunity for engagement in HIV prevention among South African adolescents.SAHARA J : journal of Social Aspects of HIV/AIDS Research Alliance · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Why bother talking to teenagers?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2012
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Exciting but exhausting: experiences with participatory research with chronically ill adolescents.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Russell M VinerDepartment of Paediatrics, Royal Free and University College Medical School, University College London NW3 2PF. R.Viner@ich.ucl.ac.uk
Maggie Barker

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdolescent Health ServicesAdultChildHumansPatient Acceptance of Health CarePhysician-Patient RelationsState MedicineUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID15831880
PMCPMC556170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.