Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15831650›Full record

ArticleHeart (British Cardiac Society)2005

Inequalities in coronary revascularisation during the 1990s: evidence from the British regional heart study.

R W Morris, P H Whincup, O Papacosta, M Walker, A Thomson

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Heart (British Cardiac Society), 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Age and sex interaction in reported help seeking in response to chest pain.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2008
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Honour your father and mother: ageism in medicine.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2007
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

R W MorrisDepartment of Primary Care and Population Sciences, Royal Free and University College Medical School, London NW3 2PF, UK. r.morris@pcps.ucl.ac.uk
P H Whincup
O Papacosta
M Walker
A Thomson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the influence of age and social circumstances on probability of revascularisation among British men.

designProspective population based study

setting24 medium sized British towns, none of which contained a hospital undertaking coronary artery bypass surgery. SUBJECTS: 5814 surviving participants of the BRHS (British regional heart study), aged 52-73 years, with no history of revascularisation when responding to a questionnaire in November 1992. MAIN OUTCOMES: Incident coronary revascularisations, as documented in general practitioner records, over the following 7.1 years and coronary angiography investigations reported by men in a further questionnaire in November 1996.

results160 men underwent at least one revascularisation during this period (4.2/1000 person-years). In multifactorial analysis, which included adjustment for incidence of major coronary heart disease or angina, a lower incidence of revascularisation was found among men aged over 65 years in November 1992 (hazard ratio 0.62, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44 to 0.87), among men with manual occupations (0.73, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.02), among men living in households possessing no car (0.44, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.80) or one car (0.60, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.87) compared with two or more cars, among council tenants (0.49, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.97), and among men living outside southern England (0.71, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.99). Only car ownership was related to the incidence of diagnostic angiography: the odds ratio for angiography for those owning fewer than two cars was 0.62 (95% CI 0.42 to 0.89).

conclusionDuring the 1990s, there were major inequalities in the probability of undergoing coronary revascularisation between British men according to socioeconomic status, age, and geographic location.

Indexed as

AgedAge FactorsAngina PectorisAngioplasty, Balloon, CoronaryCoronary Artery BypassFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionMyocardial RevascularizationProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesResidence CharacteristicsSocioeconomic FactorsUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID15831650
PMCPMC1768900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.