ArticleBMC family practice2005
Identifying future models for delivering genetic services: a nominal group study in primary care.
Article in BMC family practice, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Anticipating the primary care role in genomic medicine: expectations of genetics health professionals.Journal of community genetics · 2021Article
- Genetics workforce: distribution of genetics services and challenges to health care in California.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2020Article
- Analysis of Advantages, Limitations, and Barriers of Genetic Counseling Service Delivery Models.Journal of genetic counseling · 2016Article
- Primary care providers' experiences with and perceptions of personalized genomic medicine.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2016Article
- Are Australasian Genetic Counselors Interested in Private Practice at the Primary Care Level of Health Service?Journal of genetic counseling · 2015Article
- Genetics in primary health care and the National Policy on Comprehensive Care for People with Rare Diseases in Brazil: opportunities and challenges for professional education.Journal of community genetics · 2015Article
- Effects of a genetic counseling model on mothers of children with down syndrome: a Brazilian pilot study.Journal of genetic counseling · 2013Article
- The prospect of genome-guided preventive medicine: a need and opportunity for genetic counselors.Journal of genetic counseling · 2010Article
- [Consensus methods: review of original methods and their main alternatives used in public health].Revue d'epidemiologie et de sante publique · 2008Review
- Patients' understanding of genetic susceptibility testing in mainstream medicine: qualitative study on thrombophilia.BMC health services research · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo enable primary care medical practitioners to generate a range of possible service delivery models for genetic counselling services and critically assess their suitability.
methodsModified nominal group technique using in primary care professional development workshops.
results37 general practitioners in Wales, United Kingdom too part in the nominal group process. The practitioners who attended did not believe current systems were sufficient to meet anticipated demand for genetic services. A wide range of different service models was proposed, although no single option emerged as a clear preference. No argument was put forward for genetic assessment and counselling being central to family practice, neither was there a voice for the view that the family doctor should become skilled at advising patients about predictive genetic testing and be able to counsel patients about the wider implications of genetic testing for patients and their family members, even for areas such as common cancers. Nevertheless, all the preferred models put a high priority on providing the service in the community, and often co-located in primary care, by clinicians who had developed expertise.
conclusionThere is a need for a wider debate about how healthcare systems address individual concerns about genetic concerns and risk, especially given the increasing commercial marketing of genetic tests.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.