ArticleVirus genes2005
Reliable classification and recombination analysis of porcine endogenous retroviruses.
Article in Virus genes, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identification of Porcine Endogenous Retrovirus (PERV) packaging sequence and development of PERV packaging viral vector system.Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea) · 2015Article
- Farm animal genomics and informatics: an update.Nucleic acids research · 2005Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prevention of cross-species infection with porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERV) is crucial for xenotransplantation. Previous studies described the potential risk of infection for the PERV gamma1 subfamilies A, B and C. Replication competent PERV gamma1 proviruses designated to a particular subfamily and hybrid viruses originating from retroviral recombination events between the subfamilies were observed. Future pig genome sequencing projects will reveal multiple novel PERV proviruses from additional breeds and animals. Evaluation of these viral genomes has to be carried out to assess the potential risk of retroviral cross-species infection. In this study, we tested common sequence comparison methods for the classification of PERV sequences and the detection of hybrid clones. The examination of the polymorphic nucleotide positions was found to be the most suitable procedure. We describe a fast and simple method using bioinformatic software tools which can also be applied to analogous analyses of other viral genomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.