ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2005
Enteral administration of a simulated amniotic fluid to very low birth weight neonates.
Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Standardized feeding regimen for reducing necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants: an updated systematic review.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2017Pooled it
- Treating feeding intolerance with an enteral solution patterned after human amniotic fluid: a randomized, controlled, masked trial.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2007Trial
- The EXTrauterine Environment for Neonatal Development Supports Normal Intestinal Maturation and Development.Cellular and molecular gastroenterology and hepatology · 2020Article
- Protective effects of amniotic fluid in the setting of necrotizing enterocolitis.Pediatric research · 2017Review
- Cytokines and growth factors in the developing intestine and during necrotizing enterocolitis.Seminars in perinatology · 2017Review
- Pathophysiology and current management of necrotizing enterocolitis.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2014Review
- Necrotizing enterocolitis in term neonates: data from a multihospital health-care system.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo reduce feeding intolerance among very low birth weight neonates. STUDY
designA total of 10 neonates with birth weights of 750 to 1250 g were given oral-gastric boluses (2.5 ml/kg every 3 hours) of a solution patterned after amniotic fluid. When milk feedings were begun the milk was mixed with the test solution. The solution was given at a constant daily dose of 20 ml/kg/day while the volumes of milk feedings were gradually increased. When milk feedings reached 80 ml/kg/day the test solution was discontinued. A comparison group consisted of neonates who met study criteria but were cared for during the period immediately preceding the study. The outcome was the number of calories taken enterally over the first 21 days of life.
resultsThe test solution was begun an average of 27 hours after birth (range, 4 to 45). In the test group the first milk feedings were introduced 74 hours after birth (range, 18 to 144), which was similar to the time milk was introduced in the comparison subjects (79 hours; range, 18 to 168). After milk feedings were started, the test patients had a total of four NPO days (0.4 NPO days per patient) during their first 21 days, while the comparison group had 34 NPO days (3.4 NPO days per patient). During the first 14 days of life the test solution recipients had a median of 26.5 enteral cal/kg/day (range, 4.3 to 68.9), while the comparison neonates had 8.5 (range, 0.2 to 25; p < 0.05). During the first 21 days of life the test solution recipients had a median of 56.9 enteral cal/kg/day (range, 11.5 to 89.4), while the comparison neonates had 19.2 (range, 0.9 to 52.8; p < 0.05).
conclusionIn all, 10 VLBW infants tolerated the test solution for periods up to 14 days with no significant adverse effects. A randomized trial to determine whether this solution reduces feeding intolerance among VLBW neonates should be conducted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
15830001What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.