Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15830000›Full record

ArticleJournal of human hypertension2005

Appraisal of the knowledge of hypertensive patients and assessment of the role of the pharmacists in the management of hypertension: results of a regional survey.

S Ragot, P Sosner, G Bouche, J Guillemain, D Herpin

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human hypertension, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00460343 (Implementation of a Pharmacy-Intervention to Establish and if Necessary Improve Adherence to Antihypertensive Therapy. A Cluster Randomized Trial.), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00460343 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2007, after this paper: background citation

Implementation of a Pharmacy-Intervention to Establish and if Necessary Improve Adherence to Antihypertensive Therapy. A Cluster Randomized Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorRadboud University Medical CenterRan2007 to 2008Enrolled57ConditionsHypertensionArmsextensive implementation programme, control
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Appraisal of the Knowledge of Hypertensive Patients Regarding Blood Pressure Control and Comorbidities: Results of a French Regional Survey.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2016
    Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Why some adult Canadians do not have blood pressure measured.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2007
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

S RagotFaculté de Médecine et de Pharmacie, Institut Universitaire de Santé Publique, Poitiers, France. stephanie.ragot@univ-poitiers.fr
P Sosner
G Bouche
J Guillemain
D Herpin

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objectives of the study were to appraise the knowledge which the patients have about their hypertension, and to assess the knowledge and involvement of pharmacists in the management of the hypertensive patient. All the pharmacies in the Poitou-Charentes area were invited both to participate in a training session about arterial hypertension and asked to fill in a pharmacist's questionnaire. Furthermore, each participant was required to submit a patient's questionnaire to 20 consecutive hypertensives. A total of 104 pharmacies and 1015 hypertensive patients participated in the survey. In all, 88% of the patients (n = 893) were aware of their blood pressure (BP) figures, but 68% (349/515) considered themselves wrongly, to be normalized; 39% (n = 350) only had BP figures <140/90 mmHg. They said they had been poorly informed about recommended lifestyle changes. In all, 18% (n = 185) were equipped with an automatic device. A total of 77% (n = 779) were able to give the names of their drugs without the help of the pharmacist. Treatment-related unwanted effects were reported by 8% of the patients (n = 79). Only 18% (n = 29) of the pharmacists were able to provide a correct definition of hypertension. Most of them thought hypertension was well controlled in the general population and considered that both tolerance of and compliance with antihypertensive treatment were satisfactory. They could most often (80%, n = 135) supply a SBPM device, but 58 (36%) only were able to provide relevant advice regarding the recommended procedures. In conclusion, The BP goals and the lifestyle modifications are poorly known by the hypertensives. Pharmacists' knowledge is frequently wrong and should be improved by appropriate training programmes.

Indexed as

Outcome Assessment, Health CarePatient Education as TopicPharmacistsProfessional RoleAgedAntihypertensive AgentsBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryCommunity Pharmacy ServicesData CollectionFemaleHumansHypertensionMalePatient ComplianceProfessional-Patient RelationsTreatment OutcomeAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

PMID15830000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.