Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15829471›Full record

SynthesisJournal of medical Internet research2005

What is eHealth (3): a systematic review of published definitions.

Hans Oh, Carlos Rizo, Murray Enkin, Alejandro Jadad

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of medical Internet research, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04820790 (Mobile Application for Monitoring Patients With Home Oxygen. A Protocol of a Randomized and Controlled Clinical Trial.), which is not on this map. Cited by 246 papers, 28 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
246citing papers in PubMed, 28 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04820790 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Mobile Application for Monitoring Patients With Home Oxygen. A Protocol of a Randomized and Controlled Clinical Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorToDoMedRan2023 to 2024Enrolled45ConditionsOxygen-therapyArmsMobile applications
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

246 citing papers in PubMed, 28 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. eHealth in TB clinical management.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2022
    Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. eHealth in the support of people with mild intellectual disability in daily life: A systematic review.Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID · 2020
    Pooled it
  19. Pooled it
  20. Pooled it

186 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hans OhCentre for Global eHealth Innovation, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada.
Carlos Rizo
Murray Enkin
Alejandro Jadad

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextThe term eHealth is widely used by many individuals, academic institutions, professional bodies, and funding organizations. It has become an accepted neologism despite the lack of an agreed-upon clear or precise definition. We believe that communication among the many individuals and organizations that use the term could be improved by comprehensive data about the range of meanings encompassed by the term.

objectiveTo report the results of a systematic review of published, suggested, or proposed definitions of eHealth. DATA SOURCES: Using the search query string "eHealth" OR "e-Health" OR "electronic health", we searched the following databases: Medline and Premedline (1966-June 2004), EMBASE (1980-May 2004), International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970-May 2004), Web of Science (all years), Information Sciences Abstracts (1966-May 2004), Library Information Sciences Abstracts (1969-May 2004), and Wilson Business Abstracts (1982-March 2004). In addition, we searched dictionaries and an Internet search engine. STUDY SELECTION: We included any source published in either print format or on the Internet, available in English, and containing text that defines or attempts to define eHealth in explicit terms. Two of us independently reviewed titles and abstracts of citations identified in the bibliographic databases and Internet search, reaching consensus on relevance by discussion. DATA EXTRACTION: We retrieved relevant reports, articles, references, letters, and websites containing definitions of eHealth. Two of us qualitatively analyzed the definitions and coded them for content, emerging themes, patterns, and novel ideas. DATA SYNTHESIS: The 51 unique definitions that we retrieved showed a wide range of themes, but no clear consensus about the meaning of the term eHealth. We identified 2 universal themes (health and technology) and 6 less general (commerce, activities, stakeholders, outcomes, place, and perspectives).

conclusionsThe widespread use of the term eHealth suggests that it is an important concept, and that there is a tacit understanding of its meaning. This compendium of proposed definitions may improve communication among the many individuals and organizations that use the term.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareInternetMedical InformaticsTerminology as Topic

Identifiers

PMID15829471
PMCPMC1550636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.