Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15827556›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2005

Human papillomavirus infection in women who develop high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or cervical cancer: a case-control study in the UK.

M J Grainge, R Seth, C Coupland, L Guo, T Rittman, P Vryenhoef, J Johnson, D Jenkins, K R Neal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Infection and cervical neoplasia: facts and fiction.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2009
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

M J GraingeDivision of Epidemiology and Public Health, School of Community Health Sciences, University of Nottingham Medical School, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK. matthew.grainge@nottingham.ac.uk
R Seth
C Coupland
L Guo
T Rittman
P Vryenhoef
J Johnson
D Jenkins
K R Neal

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing might identify older women who could be withdrawn from the cervical screening programme, or require less frequent screening. A case-control study using the United Kingdom cervical screening population was set up to help address this issue. Cases comprised 575 women who developed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 2 or worse over a 13-year period following a cytologically normal baseline smear, and were stratified by age group ('under 20', '20-39' and 40 years or over). Controls (n=601) were women who remained disease free over this interval and were the same age on average as cases. DNA was extracted from the baseline smears and tested for HPV by PCR using GP5+/6+ consensus primers. HPV+ samples were tested for HPV types 16 and 18 using specific PCR primers. In all, 27.0% of cases tested positive for HPV at baseline, compared with 15.4% of controls (odds ratio (OR)=2.00; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.50-2.68). Among women aged 40 years or over, the OR for HPV 16 was 8.95 (95% CI, 2.63-30.4). These results support the need for further cervical screening of HPV- older women, as many of the cases were HPV- at baseline.

Indexed as

AdultCase-Control StudiesDNA, ViralFemaleHumansPapillomaviridaePapillomavirus InfectionsTime FactorsTumor Virus InfectionsUnited KingdomUterine Cervical DysplasiaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsDNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID15827556
PMCPMC2362046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.