Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15826509›Full record

ArticleAtencion primaria2005

[Improving communication between levels of health care: direct referral of patients to a one-stop service for major outpatient surgery].

M T Cerdán Carbonero, R Sanz López, C Martínez Ramos

Abstract readComparative StudyEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Atencion primaria, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

M T Cerdán CarboneroArea Sanitaria 7 de Atención Primaria, Madrid, Spain. mcerdan.hcsc@salud.madrid.org
R Sanz López
C Martínez Ramos

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo analyze the results obtained with a "one-stop" specialty service designed as part of a collaborative program involving primary and specialized care in order to improve communication between levels of care and reduce the delay in referral and surgical treatment for patients eligible for outpatient surgery.

designProspective, descriptive, longitudinal study.

settingMajor Outpatient Surgery Unit of the Hospital Clinico San Carlos and health centers serving Health Area 7 in Madrid, central Spain.

participantsPatients more than 14 years of age with a surgical condition involving the abdominal wall, pilonidal sinus, soft-tissue tumor, or proctological disease.

interventionDirect referral, with completed preoperative work-up, of patients from health centers to the Major Outpatient Surgery Unit of the Hospital Clinico San Carlos according to a protocol developed by consensus. The patient is seen on the same day for surgical work-up and anesthesia work-up, and is given preoperative information. Patients then make only one further visit to the hospital to undergo surgery. MAIN MEASURES: Number of patients with each diagnosis referred, diagnostic concordance between the health center and hospital, delay from referral to surgical treatment, number of trips made for different appointments, and referral rate.

resultsA total of 188 patients were referred. More than two thirds (68.7%) had an abdominal wall condition eligible for direct referral. Diagnostic concordance was 96%. The delay from referral until surgery was reduced by 60%, and the number of trips for appointments was reduced by 66.6%. The overall referral rate was 12.6%.

conclusionsBecause of its feasibility, acceptability, and cost-efficiency, the direct referral system has the potential to improve relations between primary and specialized care and enhance the quality of care by shortening the delay to treatment.

Indexed as

Ambulatory Surgical ProceduresPrimary Health CareReferral and ConsultationAdolescentAdultAgedCost-Benefit AnalysisFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPatient SelectionProspective StudiesQuality of Health Care

Identifiers

PMID15826509
PMCPMC7676129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.