Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15826438›Full record

Trial reportThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2005

Understanding of blood pressure by people with type 2 diabetes: a primary care focus group study.

Jane Stewart, Ken Brown, Denise Kendrick, Jane Dyas, Nottingham Dibetes and Blood Pressure Study Group

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Health beliefs of African-Caribbean people with type 2 diabetes: a qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2007
    Article
  9. How diabetic patients' ideas of illness course affect non-adherent behaviour: a qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2007
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jane StewartNottingham Primary Care Research Partnership, University of Nottingham, Nottingham. jane.stewart@broxtowehucknall-pct.nhs.uk
Ken Brown
Denise Kendrick
Jane Dyas
Nottingham Dibetes and Blood Pressure Study Group
University of Nottingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor many people with type 2 diabetes most care is provided in primary care. While people with both diabetes and hypertension are at increased risk of complications, little is known about their understanding of blood pressure.

aimTo explore the understanding and beliefs about the importance of blood pressure held by people with type 2 diabetes. DESIGN OF STUDY: Framework analysis of qualitative research using focus groups.

settingThirty-two participants were recruited from four general practices and a religious meeting group in Nottingham. Discussions took place in five community centres providing familiar surroundings for participants.

methodIn order to get views expressed fully, white, Asian, and African-Caribbean participants met in five separate groups. Facilitators were fluent in the appropriate language and one member of the research team was present at all focus groups.

resultsSome participants, including those with raised blood pressure, were not aware of the increased importance of achieving good blood pressure control. No participants mentioned the increased risk of eye or kidney disease as a result of the combination of diabetes and raised blood pressure. Participants' perceptions regarding the control of blood sugar and blood pressure were different: blood sugar control was seen as their responsibility but blood pressure control was seen as the responsibility of the doctor. There was scepticism regarding the diagnosis of raised blood pressure, of targets and the management of blood pressure. There was also scepticism about the advice and education about diabetes given in primary care.

conclusionsPeople with type 2 diabetes require more knowledge of the increased risks they have from raised blood pressure, although this alone is unlikely to improve blood-pressure control. Strategies to increase the degree of control over and responsibility taken for the control of blood pressure need development and may require the specific development of participatory and negotiating skills among people with type 2 diabetes. Increasing the participation of these people in their own care will require doctors and nurses to work in a different way.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthAgedAsiaBlood PressureDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic AngiopathiesEnglandFemaleFocus GroupsHumansHypertensionMaleMiddle AgedPerceptionPilot ProjectsWest Indies

Identifiers

PMID15826438
PMCPMC1463133
OpenAlexW2180450823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.