Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15821125›Full record

ArticleEukaryotic cell2005

Combinatorial repression of the hypoxic genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae by DNA binding proteins Rox1 and Mot3.

Lee G Klinkenberg, Thomas A Mennella, Katharina Luetkenhaus, Richard S Zitomer

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Eukaryotic cell, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Alterations to the yeast chromatin landscape during hypoxia.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Role of eIF5A in Mitochondrial Function.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  3. Review
  4. The HMGB ProteinBiomolecules · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Leukemia and ABC transporters.Advances in cancer research · 2015
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lee G KlinkenbergDepartment of Biological Sciences, University at Albany--State University of New York, Albany, New York 12222, USA.
Thomas A Mennella
Katharina Luetkenhaus
Richard S Zitomer
University at Albany, State University of New York · USAlbany State University · US

Funding

The Hypoxic and General Stress Responses in YeastR01GM026061 · NIGMS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT ALBANY · PI ZITOMER, RICHARD S · 1985 to 2004
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM26061NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM026061NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM026061-24
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The hypoxic genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae are transcriptionally repressed during aerobic growth through recruitment of the Ssn6/Tup1 general repression complex by the DNA binding protein Rox1. A second DNA binding protein Mot3 enhances repression of some hypoxic genes. Previous studies characterized the role of Mot3 at the hypoxic ANB1 gene as promoting synergy among one Mot3 site and two Rox1 sites comprising operator A of that gene. Here we studied the role of Mot3 in enhancing repression by Rox1 at another hypoxic gene, HEM13, which is less strongly regulated than ANB1 and has a very different arrangement of Rox1 and Mot3 binding sites. By assessing the effects of deleting Rox1 and Mot3 sites individually and in combination, we found that the major repression of HEM13 occurred through three Mot3 sites closely spaced with a single Rox1 site. While the Mot3 sites functioned additively, they enhanced repression by the single Rox1 site, and the presence of Rox1 enhanced the additive effects of the Mot3 sites. In addition, using a Rox1-Ssn6 fusion protein, we demonstrated that Mot3 enhances Rox1 repression through helping recruit the Ssn6/Tup1 complex. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays indicated that Rox1 stabilized Mot3 binding to DNA. Integrating these results, we were able to devise a set of rules that govern the combinatorial interactions between Rox1 and Mot3 to achieve differential repression.

Indexed as

Cell HypoxiaGene Expression Regulation, FungalBinding SitesChromatin ImmunoprecipitationDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA, FungalDNA PrimersEukaryotic Translation Initiation Factor 5APeptide Initiation FactorsRepressor ProteinsRNA-Binding ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsTranscription FactorsTranscription, GeneticDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA, FungalDNA PrimersEukaryotic Translation Initiation Factor 5AMOT3 protein, S cerevisiaePeptide Initiation FactorsRepressor ProteinsRNA-Binding ProteinsROX1 protein, S cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID15821125
PMCPMC1087805
OpenAlexW2116179409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.