Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15817800›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of respiratory and critical care medicine2005

The mysterious pulmonary brush cell: a cell in search of a function.

Lynne Reid, Barbara Meyrick, Veena B Antony, Ling-Yi Chang, James D Crapo, Herbert Y Reynolds

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. POU2F3 in SCLC: Clinicopathologic and Genomic Analysis With a Focus on Its Diagnostic Utility in Neuroendocrine-Low SCLC.Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Bitter Taste Receptors in the Airway Cells Functions.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. SCLC Subtypes Defined by ASCL1, NEUROD1, POU2F3, and YAP1: A Comprehensive Immunohistochemical and Histopathologic Characterization.Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer · 2020
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Epithelial cell function and remodeling in nasal polyposis.Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lynne ReidDivision of Lung Diseases, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute/NIH, Two Rockledge Center, 67-1 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892-7952, USA.
Barbara Meyrick
Veena B Antony
Ling-Yi Chang
James D Crapo
Herbert Y Reynolds
National Jewish Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brush cells, also termed tuft, caveolated, multivesicular, and fibrillovesicular cells, are part of the epithelial layer in the gastrointestinal and respiratory tracts. The cells are characterized by the presence of a tuft of blunt, squat microvilli (approximately 120-140/cell) on the cell surface. The microvilli contain filaments that stretch into the underlying cytoplasm. They have a distinctive pear shape with a wide base and a narrow microvillous apex. The function of the pulmonary brush cell is obscure. For this reason, a working group convened on August 23, 2004, in Bethesda, Maryland, to review the physiologic role of the brush (microvillous) cell in normal airways and alveoli and in respiratory diseases involving the alveolar region (e.g., emphysema and fibrosis) and airway disease characterized by either excessive or insufficient amounts of airway fluid (e.g., cystic fibrosis, chronic bronchitis, and exercise-induced asthma). The group formulated several suggestions for future investigation. For example, it would be useful to have a panel of specific markers for the brush cell and in this way separate these cells for culture and more direct examination of their function (e.g., microarray analysis and proteomics). Using quantitative analysis, it was suggested to examine the number and location of the cells in disease models. Understanding the function of these cells in alveoli and airways may provide clues to the pathogenesis of several disease states (e.g., cystic fibrosis and fibrosis) as well as a key for new therapeutic modalities.

Indexed as

AnimalsEducationHumansMicroscopy, ElectronMicrovilliPulmonary AlveoliRespiratory Mucosa

Identifiers

PMID15817800
PMCPMC2718446
OpenAlexW2063651920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.