ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2005
Ethics and research governance in a multicentre study: add 150 days to your study protocol.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recruitment and retention in a multicentre randomised controlled trial in Bell's palsy: a case study.BMC medical research methodology · 2007Trial
- Using evidence when planning for trial recruitment: An international perspective from time-poor trialists.PloS one · 2019Article
- Procedure versus process: ethical paradigms and the conduct of qualitative research.BMC medical ethics · 2012Article
- Bureaucracy stifles medical research in Britain: a tale of three trials.BMC medical research methodology · 2012Article
- One stop or full stop? The continuing challenges for researchers despite the new streamlined NHS research governance process.BMC health services research · 2010Article
- Article
- Evaluating eHealth: undertaking robust international cross-cultural eHealth research.PLoS medicine · 2009Article
- Regulation and the social licence for medical research.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2008Article
- Setting up non-commercial clinical trials takes too long in the UK: findings from a prospective study.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2008Article
- Bypassing bureaucracy to answer important questions quickly.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2008Article
- Principal investigator views of the IRB system.International journal of medical sciences · 2008Article
- Consent bias in research: how to avoid it.Heart (British Cardiac Society) · 2007Article
- The Department of Health's research governance framework remains an impediment to multi-centre studies: findings from a national descriptive study.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2007Article
- Research governance impediments to clinical trials: a retrospective survey.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2007Article
- Overcoming barriers to recruitment in health research.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2006Review
- Non-commercial clinical trials of a medicinal product: can they survive the current process of research approvals in the UK?Journal of medical ethics · 2006Review
- Research governance: research governance approval is putting people off research.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2006Article
- Research governance: whose idea is it?BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2006Article
- What is eHealth (5): a research agenda for eHealth through stakeholder consultation and policy context review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.