ReviewBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2005
Managing common mental health disorders in primary care: conceptual models and evidence base.
Review in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
78 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Parental mental illness and the risk of offspring cancer in childhood: a pooled meta-analysis of English and Swedish national cohorts.BMC psychiatry · 2025Pooled it
- Consultation liaison in primary care for people with mental disorders.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Collaborative care for depression and anxiety problems.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012Pooled it
- Counselling for mental health and psychosocial problems in primary care.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011Pooled it
- On-site mental health workers delivering psychological therapy and psychosocial interventions to patients in primary care: effects on the professional practice of primary care providers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2009Pooled it
- A systematic review of complex system interventions designed to increase recovery from depression in primary care.BMC health services research · 2006Pooled it
- Collaborative Care Versus Consultation Liaison for Patients With Depression or Anxiety Disorders in General Practice in Denmark: 18-Month Follow-Up From the Collabri Flex Trials.Depression and anxiety · 2025Trial
- Model of integrated mental health video consultations for people with depression or anxiety in primary care (PROVIDE-C): assessor masked, multicentre, randomised controlled trial.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2024Trial
- Primary care patients' experiences of video consultations for depression and anxiety: a qualitative interview study embedded in a randomized feasibility trial.BMC health services research · 2023Trial
- Lessons learned from service design of a trial of a digital mental health service: Informing implementation in primary care clinics.Translational behavioral medicine · 2020Trial
- SBIRT Implementation for Adolescents in Urban Federally Qualified Health Centers.Journal of substance abuse treatment · 2016Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- A multidisciplinary primary care team consultation in a socio-economically deprived community: an exploratory randomised controlled trial.BMC health services research · 2011Trial
- Trial
- Collaborative Depression Trial (CADET): multi-centre randomised controlled trial of collaborative care for depression--study protocol.BMC health services research · 2009Trial
- Well-functioning depression care collaboration: general practitioners' experiences with specialized mental health services.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2026Article
- The Role of Emotional Well-Being in Diabetes Prevention and Management.Annual review of nutrition · 2026Review
- Preventing and Treating Insomnia Symptoms in Midlife and Older Adults (ASLEEP): Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial Using the PROTECT Norge Infrastructure.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.