ArticleJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2004
The use of the point of care Helena ICHOR/Plateletworks and the Accumetrics Ultegra RPFA for assessment of platelet function with GPIIB-IIIa antagonists.
Article in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Methodological Approaches in the Evaluation of Platelet Structure and Function: An Instrumental Perspective.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2026Review
- PlateletworksJournal of personalized medicine · 2021Article
- Platelet function tests: a comparative review.Vascular health and risk management · 2015Review
- The Utility of Platelet and Coagulation Testing of Antithrombotics: Fusing Science with Patient Care.Drug development research · 2013Article
- Point-of-care platelet function testing in patients undergoing PCI: between a rock and a hard place.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate a newly modified rapid platelet function analysis system (ICHOR/ Plateletworks) and to compare the results obtained with those of traditional light transmission aggregometry (LTA), and the Ultegra/RPFA system.
backgroundAnti-platelet therapy is standard of care for patients as an adjunct to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or for medical management of non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE ACS). Recent clinical trial results suggest that the three currently approved platelet GPIIb-IIIa receptor antagonists, eptifibatide, tirofiban and abciximab, may vary in extent of inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA) at the approved doses. Thus, pharmacodynamic evaluations of these agents to determine the extent of platelet function inhibition, especially during the periprocedural time of a cardiac intervention, are necessary. A rapid measurement method as a surrogate for LTA, the current gold standard, would be ideal in order to have the option for dose monitoring or adjustment prior to or during an intervention. The Helena ICHOR/ Plateletworks may be useful for point of care testing.
methodsBlood samples collected in D-Phe-Pro-Arg-chloromethyl ketone dihydrochloride (PPACK) anticoagulant were treated with increasing concentrations of eptifibatide, tirofiban or abciximab. LTA was carried out in conjunction with the ICHOR/Plateletworks, using a modified method, and Accumetrics Ultegra with RPFA cartridges.
resultsThis study demonstrated that platelet inhibition measured by the ICHOR/Plateletworks mirrored the level of IPA obtained with LTA. In contrast, the Ultegra system had less correlation when compared to LTA at inhibition levels < 90%.
conclusionsBased on these data, the ICHOR/ Plateletworks utilized under modified guidelines may serve as a surrogate for LTA when rapid measurements are necessary.A rapid platelet function measurement method as a surrogate for light transmission aggregometry (LTA), the current gold standard, is ideal in order to have the option for GPIIb-IIIa antagonist dose monitoring or adjustment prior to or during a coronary intervention. A newly modified rapid platelet function analysis system (ICHOR/Plateletworks was evaluated and compared to the results obtained with traditional light transmission aggregometry (LTA), and the Ultegra/RPFA system. Blood samples collected in D-Phe-Pro-Arg-chloromethyl ketone dihydrochloride (PPACK) anticoagulant were treated with increasing concentrations of eptifibatide, tirofiban or abciximab. LTA was carried out in conjunction with the ICHOR/Plateletworks, using a modified method, and Accumetrics Ultegra with RPFA cartridges. Based on these data, the ICHOR/Plateletworks utilized under modified guidelines may serve as a surrogate for LTA when rapid measurements are necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.