ReviewAnnals of hematology1992
The diagnosis of acute leukemia with undifferentiated or minimally differentiated blasts.
Review in Annals of hematology, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- A deconvolution method and its application in analyzing the cellular fractions in acute myeloid leukemia samples.BMC genomics · 2020Article
- SCALE method for single-cell ATAC-seq analysis via latent feature extraction.Nature communications · 2019Article
- Lineage-specific and single-cell chromatin accessibility charts human hematopoiesis and leukemia evolution.Nature genetics · 2016Article
- TdT expression in acute myeloid leukemia with minimal differentiation is associated with distinctive clinicopathological features and better overall survival following stem cell transplantation.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2013Article
- Genome wide molecular analysis of minimally differentiated acute myeloid leukemia.Haematologica · 2009Article
- Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in adults: immunological subtypes and clinical features at presentation.Annals of hematology · 1993Article
- Reproducibility of the morphological diagnostic criteria for acute myeloid leukemia: the GIMEMA group experience.Annals of hematology · 1993Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A small group of acute leukemias can be classified by morphological, cytochemical, or immunological marker analysis neither as acute lymphatic leukemia nor as acute myeloid leukemia. These leukemias are referred to as acute undifferentiated leukemia (AUL) and make up 2%-7% of the acute nonmyeloid leukemias. These leukemias are poorly defined in the literature and are also sometimes referred to as AML-MO. Most of the definitions include in the morphological and cytochemical criteria the expression of myeloid antigens. Here the value of these markers and of other techniques used in the diagnosis of undifferentiated or minimally differentiated leukemia is discussed. More than half of the leukemias that are undifferentiated by morphology and cytochemistry on the light-microscopic level show a positive reaction for myeloperoxidase by electron microscopy, which points to an early myeloid differentiation of those leukemias. Immunological marker analysis in most cases is inconclusive. Most show a positive reaction for CD 13, CD 33 or other myeloid-associated markers. However, in about half of these leukemias co-expression of lymphatic markers is seen. In a small minority, only lymphatic markers are expressed. Cytogenetic abnormalities which are found in these leukemias vary in type, and antigen receptor rearrangements are not lineage specific. Receptor studies, gene expression, and in vitro culture studies may, in the near future, contribute substantially to our knowledge about the commitment of these undifferentiated or minimally differentiated blasts. Recent definitions for AUL and AML-MO based on these different techniques are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
1581403What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.