Evidence map›Paper›PMID 1581403›Full record

ReviewAnnals of hematology1992

The diagnosis of acute leukemia with undifferentiated or minimally differentiated blasts.

M B van't Veer

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of hematology, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

M B van't VeerDepartment of Hematology, Dr. Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A small group of acute leukemias can be classified by morphological, cytochemical, or immunological marker analysis neither as acute lymphatic leukemia nor as acute myeloid leukemia. These leukemias are referred to as acute undifferentiated leukemia (AUL) and make up 2%-7% of the acute nonmyeloid leukemias. These leukemias are poorly defined in the literature and are also sometimes referred to as AML-MO. Most of the definitions include in the morphological and cytochemical criteria the expression of myeloid antigens. Here the value of these markers and of other techniques used in the diagnosis of undifferentiated or minimally differentiated leukemia is discussed. More than half of the leukemias that are undifferentiated by morphology and cytochemistry on the light-microscopic level show a positive reaction for myeloperoxidase by electron microscopy, which points to an early myeloid differentiation of those leukemias. Immunological marker analysis in most cases is inconclusive. Most show a positive reaction for CD 13, CD 33 or other myeloid-associated markers. However, in about half of these leukemias co-expression of lymphatic markers is seen. In a small minority, only lymphatic markers are expressed. Cytogenetic abnormalities which are found in these leukemias vary in type, and antigen receptor rearrangements are not lineage specific. Receptor studies, gene expression, and in vitro culture studies may, in the near future, contribute substantially to our knowledge about the commitment of these undifferentiated or minimally differentiated blasts. Recent definitions for AUL and AML-MO based on these different techniques are discussed.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseHumansLeukemiaLeukemia, MyeloidMicroscopy, Electron

Identifiers

PMID1581403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.