Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15813655›Full record

ReviewDrugs & aging2005

Merkel cell carcinoma of skin: diagnosis and management strategies.

Michael Poulsen

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs & aging, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Merkel cell carcinoma of the head and neck: emphasizing the risk of undertreatment.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2016
    Observational
  8. The effect of resveratrol in combination with irradiation and chemotherapy: study using Merkel cell carcinoma cell lines.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2014
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Merkel cell carcinoma.American journal of clinical oncology · 2013
    Review
  11. Activation of PI3K signaling in Merkel cell carcinoma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2012
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Expression of MMP-10, MMP-21, MMP-26, and MMP-28 in Merkel cell carcinoma.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2009
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Epidermoid cyst mimicry: report of seven cases and review of the literature.The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology · 2009
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael PoulsenSouthern Zone Radiation Oncology Services, Mater Centre, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Mater Health Services · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) of the skin is a rare form of cutaneous malignancy of neuroendocrine origin with a propensity to affect predominately elderly patients in sun-exposed areas. The tumour has an extremely aggressive growth pattern with the potential to seed into the dermal lymphatics at an early stage as well as spread to nodes and distant sites. Successful outcomes can be achieved with early diagnosis and a multidisciplinary approach to management. Patients with MCC should be carefully staged to exclude distant metastatic disease. Treatment should be approached with both the primary site and the lymph nodes in mind. The primary site should be excised with clear margins, followed by postoperative radiotherapy to the primary site and affected nodes. Addition of chemotherapy to patients perceived to be at high-risk of distant recurrence (e.g. those with involved nodes) has been considered, but evidence supporting this approach is relatively scant. This treatment strategy needs to be approached with caution in the elderly because of the risk of myelosuppression. An aggressive treatment approach is warranted at the first attempt to treat MCC as treatment for recurrent disease is less likely to be successful.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Merkel CellSkin NeoplasmsAgedHumansNeoplasm StagingPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID15813655
OpenAlexW2037867508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.