ArticleEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2005
Drug treatment modalities in psychiatric inpatient practice: a 20-year comparison.
Article in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Treatment patterns in inpatient depression care.International journal of methods in psychiatric research · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe present study investigated whether the increased number of psychotropic agents available in Italy in the last 20 years increased the proportion of inpatients being treated with individual medication classes and the proportion receiving combined treatments with agents of the same class or of different classes.
methodsThis study was conducted in South-Verona, Italy. From the local Psychiatric Case Register (PCR) all patients consecutively admitted to the inpatient unit during the years 1981/1982, 1991/92 and 2001/02 were extracted. Drug use at discharge was derived from clinical records, while service use data were extracted from the PCR.
resultsDuring the six years surveyed 160 patients were admitted in 1981/82, 139 in 1991/92 and 228 in 2001/02. An increasing proportion of subjects receiving antipsychotic, antidepressant and benzodiazepine treatment at discharge was observed. In addition, we found an increasing proportion of patients receiving two or more psychotropic drugs at discharge, which accounted for almost 80% of cases in 2001/02. The number of psychotropic agents prescribed at hospital discharge was positively correlated with the total consumption of psychotropic drugs. A relevant proportion of patients were also dispensed agents for medical conditions, yielding an average number of 3.2 prescriptions in 2001/02. The Lavik score, a summary index of service use, indicated that subjects admitted in 1981/82 were moderate users of psychiatric services, while those admitted in 1991/92 and in 2001/02 were high users of psychiatric services.
conclusionThis study documented emerging trends toward polypharmacotherapy and higher total doses. Additional pharmacoepidemiological research is needed to clarify both the beneficial and, potentially, adverse effects associated with these trends in psychiatric pharmacotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.