Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15810646›Full record

Trial reportDigestive diseases and sciences2005

Efficacy of mesalazine in the treatment of symptomatic diverticular disease.

Francesco Di Mario, Giovanni Aragona, Gioacchino Leandro, Giuseppe Comparato, Libera Fanigliulo, Lucas G Cavallaro, Giulia M Cavestro, Veronica Iori, Marta Maino, Alì M Moussa and 3 more

Abstract readClinical TrialComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 108 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Mesalamine (5-ASA) for the prevention of recurrent diverticulitis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Systematic review of medical therapy to prevent recurrent diverticulitis.International journal of colorectal disease · 2012
    Pooled it
  6. Colonic diverticular disease.BMJ clinical evidence · 2007
    Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Dietary Risk Factors: Fiber and Beyond.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2025
    Review
  15. Coffee and Microbiota: A Narrative Review.Current issues in molecular biology · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Update on the management of sigmoid diverticulitis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2021
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Francesco Di MarioChair of Gastroenterology, University of Parma, Parma, Italy. francesco.dimario@unipr.it
Giovanni Aragona
Gioacchino Leandro
Giuseppe Comparato
Libera Fanigliulo
Lucas G Cavallaro
Giulia M Cavestro
Veronica Iori
Marta Maino
Alì M Moussa
Alessandro Gnocchi
Giancarlo Mazzocchi
Angelo Franzé
University of Parma · ITGastroenterology Hospital "Saverio de Bellis" · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to improve symptoms by means of mesalazine in symptomatic colonic diverticular disease patients. One hundred seventy outpatients (98 M, 72 F; age, 67.1 years; range, 39-84 years) were assigned to four different schedules: rifaximin, 200 mg bid (Group R1: 39 pts), rifaximin, 400 mg bid (Group R2: 43 pts), mesalazine, 400 mg bid (Group M1: 40 pts), and mesalazine, 800 mg bid (Group M2: 48 pts), for 10 days per month. At baseline and after 3 months we recorded 11 clinical variables (upper/lower abdominal pain/discomfort, bloating, tenesmus, diarrhea, abdominal tenderness, fever, general illness, nausea, emesis, dysuria), scored from 0 = no symptoms to 3 = severe. The global symptomatic score was the sum of all symptom scores. After 3 months in all schedules but Group R1, 3 of the 11 symptoms improved (P < 0.03); the global score decreased in all groups but Group R1 (P < 0.0001). Mesalazine-treated patients had the lowest global score at 3 months (P < 0.001). Mesalazine is as effective as rifaximin (higher dosage schedule) for diminishing some symptoms, but it appears to be better than rifaximin for improving the global score in those patients.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnalysis of VarianceDiverticulitis, ColonicDiverticulum, ColonDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIntestinal MucosaMaleMesalamineMiddle AgedMesalamineRifamycinsRifaximin

Identifiers

PMID15810646
OpenAlexW2745486728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.