Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15809862›Full record

ArticlePlanta2005

Three dimensional confocal and electron microscopy imaging define the dynamics and mechanisms of diploidisation at early stages of barley microspore-derived embryogenesis.

Pablo González-Melendi, Carmen Ramírez, Pilar S Testillano, Jochen Kumlehn, María Carmen Risueño

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Planta, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Pablo González-MelendiCentro de Investigaciones Biológicas, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Carmen Ramírez
Pilar S Testillano
Jochen Kumlehn
María Carmen Risueño
Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas Margarita Salas · ESLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to determine the timing and mechanisms of the spontaneous diploidisation throughout microspore-derived embryogenesis in barley, we have estimated the ploidy level of individual nuclei within young pro-embryos, from the first androgenetic division up to multinuclear structures still surrounded by the exine. Our methodological approach was based on the measure of the intensity of fluorescence after 4,6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole dihydrochloride staining, nuclear size and number of nucleoli in the confocal microscope. This method avoids the overlapping of the fluorescence signal in multinuclear pro-embryos, which cannot be studied using cytophotometer methods based on other types of fluorescence microscopes. The identification of haploid and diploid nuclei enabled us to determine the timing of diploidisation at early stages throughout androgenetic development. We found that diploidisation is an ongoing process that can start after the first embryogenic division and continues in multinuclear pro-embryos. Reconstruction of 3D-images of entire pro-embryos and the observation of cross and longitudinal sections across stacks of optical sections, together with correlative light and electron microscopy, provided evidences of nuclear fusion as the main mechanism of diploidisation.

Indexed as

DiploidyEmbryonic DevelopmentHaploidyHordeumMicroscopy, ConfocalMicroscopy, ElectronSeeds

Identifiers

PMID15809862
OpenAlexW1972560658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.