Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15808032›Full record

SynthesisThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2005

N-of-1 trials of quinine efficacy in skeletal muscle cramps of the leg.

Rachel Woodfield, Felicity Goodyear-Smith, Bruce Arroll

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical TrialMeta-AnalysisMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Quinine for muscle cramps.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  3. Leg cramps.BMJ clinical evidence · 2009
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Nocturnal leg cramps.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2010
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. N-of-1 trials: an opportunity to tailor treatment in individual patients.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2005
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rachel WoodfieldSchool of Pharmacy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Felicity Goodyear-Smith
Bruce Arroll
University of Otago · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSkeletal muscle cramps affect over a third of the ambulatory elderly population. Quinine is the established treatment, but there are safety concerns, and evidence for efficacy is conflicting. A recent meta-analysis established a small advantage for quinine, but identified the need for additional studies. N-of-1 trials compare two treatments, in a randomised, double-blind, multiple crossover study on a patient-by-patient basis. They have been used to compare treatments in osteoarthritis and may be suitable for determining the individual efficacy of quinine.

aimTo establish efficacy and safety of quinine sulphate use for the treatment of leg-muscle cramp. DESIGN OF STUDY: Double-blind, randomised series of n-of-1 controlled trials of quinine versus placebo for muscle cramps.

settingNew Zealand general practices.

methodThe participants were 13 general practice patients (six males; seven females; median age = 75 years) already prescribed quinine. Following a 2-week washout, each patient received three 4-week treatment blocks of quinine sulphate and matched placebo capsules with an individual, randomised crossover design. The main outcome measures were: patient diaries of cramp occurrence, duration and severity; capsule counts; and blood quinine levels in the final treatment block.

resultsTen patients completed the trial. Three patients were identified for whom quinine was clearly beneficial (P <0.05), six showed non-significant benefit and one showed no benefit. All patients elected to continue quinine post-study.

conclusionSeries of n -of-1 studies differentiated patients whom quinine had statistically significant effects; those with trend towards effectiveness; those for whom quinine was probably not effective. Ideally n-of-1 trial should be performed when a patient is commenced on quinine. More cycles in n-of-1 studies of quinine may address issues of statistical power.

Indexed as

AgedCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansLegMaleMuscle CrampMuscle, SkeletalNew ZealandPatient ComplianceQuinineSleep-Wake Transition DisordersTreatment OutcomeQuinine

Identifiers

PMID15808032
PMCPMC1463087
OpenAlexW2117002620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.